Influence of percutaneous coronary intervention timing on the prognosis of patients with acute ST segment elevation myocardial infarction
Jun Wang,Qi Hua,Kang Li,Li Wang,Yunfei Wang,Xiaoming Li,Song Xue,Dachuan Jiang,Qiang Kong,Shaodong Hu,Yucong Zhang,Qiang Shao,Machao Liu,Xia Zhao,Shan Wang,Tao Han,Weiying Jin,Jingxiong Wang,Jing Li
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1007-5410.2014.06.005
2014-01-01
Abstract:Objective To evaluate the influence of percutaneous coronary intervention ( PCI ) timing on prognosis of patients with acute ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Methods A total of 344 patients with STEMI were divided into three groups according to the reperfusion strategies:group A:(no emergent PCI, n=110),group B:(door to balloon time within 6 h after symptom onset, n=118) and group C (door to balloon time within 6-12 h after symptom onset, n=116). Clinical outcomes were compared among three groups. Results There was significant difference in clinical characteristics among group A,B and C, including blood glucose [(8. 4 ± 4. 7) mmol/L, (7. 7 ± 3. 3) mmol/L and (7. 7 ± 4. 6 ) mmol/L, respectively, P = 0. 002 ] , hyperlipidemia history ( 24. 5﹪, 5. 9﹪ and 33. 6﹪, respectively, P = 0. 008 ) , ≥3 risk factors of cardiovascular disease ( 25. 5﹪, 9. 5﹪ and 43. 1﹪,respectively, P = 0. 014 ) and lesion number ( P = 0. 027 ) . In-hospital incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events ( MACE) was 12. 7﹪ in group A, 2. 5﹪ in group B and 12. 9﹪ in group C ( P=0. 016). Cumulative incidence of MACE in three groups was 20. 9﹪, 10. 2﹪ and 23. 3﹪ ( P=0. 011) during follow up. In cox proportional hazards regression model, age, creatinine, heart rate, PCI time >6 h (RR:2. 268, 95% CI:1. 124_4. 578,P=0. 022) and anterior wall myocardial infarction were independent predictors for MACE during 36 months follow up. Conclusions In patients with STEMI, there is no obvious benefits from reopening of culprit artery 6 hours after symptom onset. Therefore, it is crucial to perform reperfusion therapy with 6 h.