Vapor‐phase Elemental Mercury Adsorption by Ca(OH)2 Impregnated with MnO2 and Ag in Fixed‐bed System

Y. J. Wang,Y. F. Duan,Z. J. Huang,S. L. Meng,L. G. Yang,C. S. Zhao
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/apj.347
2009-01-01
Asia-Pacific Journal of Chemical Engineering
Abstract:The ability of three sorbents (untreated Ca(OH)(2), MnO2-impregnated Ca(OH)(2) and Ag-impregnated Ca(OH)(2)) removing the elemental mercury had been studied using a laboratory-scale fixed-bed reactor at 80 degrees C under simulated fuel gas conditions. The adsorption performance of the three sorbents was compared by mercury removal efficiency and adsorption capacity. The effect of acid gases such as HCl and SO2 on the mercury removal was investigated and presented in this article. The results showed that the mercury removal by Ca(OH)2 was mainly controlled by physical mechanisms. In the case of Ca(OH)(2), the presence of both SO2 and HCl promoted the He removal, and compared HCl with SO2, HCl had a higher mercury removal than SO2. Ca(OH)(2) impregnated with MnO2 had a slightly higher mercury removal than the original Ca(OH)(2), but it was beneficial for mercury speciation. The presence of both SO2 and HCl promotes the Hg-0 removal greatly, which was adsorbed by Ca(OH)(2) impregnated with MnO2. The Ca(OH)(2) impregnated with MnO2 adsorbed more than 50% total Hg due to the occurrence of chemisorptions. The mercury removal by Ca(OH)(2) impregnated with Ag was the highest. The reason might be that mercury integrated with silver easily that could produce silver amalgam alloy. (c) 2009 Curtin University of Technology and John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?