Abstract:Purpose This study attempts to document the impact of financial leverage on corporate innovation in the Chinese nonfinancial public firms listed on Shenzhen and Shanghai stock exchanges. Design/methodology/approach The firm-level data are collected from CSMAR database for ten years, ranging from 2007 to 2016. The authors have employed the panel fixed effects model and further system GMM approach for analysis. The sample is segregated on the basis of state (SOE) and nonstate ownership (NSOE) to check for the diverse effects. In total, three different proxies of financial leverage are used to unearth the varying impact of short-time and long-term leverage separately. Further, corporate innovation is divided into input innovation (R&D/Sales and R&D/Assets) and output innovation (patents and inventions). Findings The results suggest that financial leverage is detrimental to the input innovation while conducive for the output innovation when measured by the number of patents. Contrarily, leverage has a negative influence over the output innovation when measured by the number of inventions. This implies that leverage is more damaging for the highest form of innovativeness (inventions) in China. Input innovation is more sensitive to the changes in long-term leverage versus short-term leverage. Further, the authors find that innovation in SOEs is more sensitive to the changes in the leverage as compared to the NSOEs. The results are free from the threat of endogeneity and identification problems, as reported by the system GMM model. Research limitations/implications The authors did not segregate the sample on the basis of industry/sector. Practical implications The firms pursuing a strategy of radical innovation should try to keep their debt levels lower in order to achieve a higher innovation performance. Although, a rise in the leverage may mean an increased access to finance for a firm but such an access comes at a cost in the form of damage to the corporate innovation. However, increased debt financing may not be so bad for the firms that want to achieve a moderate and not the highest level of innovation. Such firms can produce recurring and synergic effects with debt financing and moderate innovation, once they achieve a level of innovation performance that satisfies their financiers. Originality/value To the best of authors’ knowledge, this is probably the first study to check the impact of firm-level financial leverage on both input and output innovation in the Chinese public-listed nonfinancial firms' panel data perspective till now.

On the Selection of Innovation Financing Resources:Based on the Financing Structure and the Innovation of Listed-company in China

FINANCING STRUCTURE AND INNOVATION---Evidence from A-share of Listing Corporation of Strategic Emerging Industries in China

Research on the Heterogeneous Effects of Internal and External Financing on the Innovation Investment of Enterprises at Different Stages——Evidence from the Listed Manufacturing Companies in China

The impact of external R&D financing on innovation process from a supply-demand perspective

R&D subsidies, executive background and innovation of Chinese listed companies

The Effects of Financing Channels on Enterprise Innovation and Life Cycle in Chinese A-Share Listed Companies: An Empirical Analysis

Can government subsidies improve innovation performance? Evidence from Chinese listed companies

How innovation funding leads enterprises to engage in research and development: Small and medium enterprises' perspective

The Effect of Financing on Firm Innovation: Multiple Case Studies on Chinese Manufacturing Enterprises

Financial constraints, government subsidies, and corporate innovation

The more funds the better? External funds, R&D investment and firm innovation: critical role of firm leaders' international experience

Government subsidies, R&D investment and innovation performance: analysis from pharmaceutical sector in China

The Impact of Corporate Innovation on Environmental Performance: The Moderating Effect of Financing Constraints and Government Subsidies

Do government subsidies promote enterprise innovation?——Evidence from Chinese listed companies

Government R&D Subsidies and Firms' Innovation Performance: Empirical Evidence Based on Listed Companies in the New Energy Industry

Do government subsidies improve innovation investment for new energy firms: A quasi-natural experiment of China's listed companies

Financial leverage and corporate innovation in Chinese public-listed firms

Corporate financialization, financing constraints, and innovation efficiency—Empirical evidence based on listed Chinese pharmaceutical companies

Research on Technological Innovation Investment, Financing Constraints, and Corporate Financial Risk: Evidence from China

Effect of the Strategic Emerging Industry Support Program on Corporate Innovation among Listed Companies in China

Enterprise Financing Mode and Technological Innovation Behavior Selection: An Empirical Analysis Based on the Data of the World Bank’s Survey of Chinese Private Enterprises