Psychological resilience and associated factors in caring for mass burn patients among rescue nurses: A cross-sectional study
Mengxia Chen,Rong Su,Min Hu,Xiaorong Huang,Bin Wu,Lin Zhou,Yingchun Liu,Xinyu Li,Jianfang Zhang,Ping Feng
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.burns.2024.07.022
IF: 2.609
2024-07-24
Burns
Abstract:This current study explored the relationship between challenge-hindrance stressors, coping style, and psychological resilience among rescue nurses caring for mass burn patients. Methods: This study is multicenter and cross-sectional. Registered nurses who saved and cared for extensively burned patients at two tertiary hospitals in mainland China between January and August of 2023 were selected through purposeful sampling. Online surveys were used to gather data. Multiple linear regression and Pearson correlation were used to examine the link between challenge-hindrance stressors, coping style, and psychological resilience. Results: 121 nurses completed the online questionnaires. The mean score for psychological resilience was 63.80 ± 11.63, for the challenge-stressor 16.23 ± 4.38, and for hindrance-stressor 9.85 ± 3.89. The total score for positive coping style was 23.69 ± 7.73, and that for the negative coping style 11.45 ± 5.21. Pearson analysis showed total resilience score was positively correlated with challenge stressors (r = 0.697, p<0.05) and positive coping style (r = 0.616, p<0.05), and negatively correlated with the hindrance stressors (r = -0.512, p<0.05) and negative coping style (r = -0.589, p<0.05) among rescuer nurses. Multiple linear regression analyses identified that having attended rescues before, challenge-hindrance, and coping style are the potential influencing factors of resilience. Conclusion: In mass burns accidents, rescuer nurses have a medium level of psychological resilience, which positively and significantly correlated with challenge stressors and positive coping style. It is suggested that more attention should be devoted to the target population to formulate effective intervention plans, reduce psychological impact, and improve their capacity for coping with disasters.