Abstract:Academic journal is an important medium of research publication and academic exchange.The academic journal evaluation system in China has been initially established,but quality and innovativeness evaluations are still weak.There are profound socio-economic,cultural,administrative reasons for this problem,which have caused negative impact on the value orientation of scholars and their research behavior,affected the objectivity and impartiality of academic evaluation,and undermined the cleanness and pureness of the academia. Scholars of the humanities and social sciences and library and information science experts have already reached a consensus that academic evaluation in the humanities and social sciences should be more diverse,localized and content-based,and there should be quality and innovativeness evaluations.In the past dozen years,academic journal evaluation is mainly quantitative and formal,but now more emphasis should be placed on content evaluation and innovativeness evaluation to create a fair and free environment for academic journal evaluation. On the premise of maintaining the reasonable elements in the existing academic journal evaluation system,this article proposes a combination of three new concepts including formal evaluation,content evaluation and effectiveness evaluation,and puts forward a new evaluation method integrating peer-review and bibliometric evaluation.The proposed combination of the three new concepts would be able to explain the history and the current situation of journal evaluation,and also predict its future.The aim of the new thinking and the approach to realize it is to overcome the institutional obstacles that hinder the healthy development of academic evaluation,to establish a fair and rational academic environment for scholars,and to create an open and constructive academic environment in the future.

Problems and Solutions of Performance Evaluation of China's Media Industry

Establishment and Improvement of an Assessment and Accountability System for Eco-environmental Performance Evaluation

Evaluation of the High-Quality Development of China's Media Industry.

International Outlook and Performance Evaluation Index Designing for Agricultural Building Project

Situation and Problems in Performance Evaluation of State - owned Hospitals in China

Performance Evaluation of Public Institutions: a Chinese Case

University Faculty Performance Evaluation System in China

International Performance of Chinese Institutes in Different Disciplines——A Bibliometric View

Thinking and Exploration on the Choosing and Appraising Mechanism of P.E Teaching and Research Personnels in China

A Review of Research on Performance Evaluation in the Colleges and Universities of China

The Undergraduate Teaching Evaluation System in China: Progress, Problems and Suggestions

Quality and Innovativeness in the Evaluation of Academic Journals

Balanced Scorecard and Performance Evaluation of Radio & TV Industry: Taking Nanjing Radio&Television Group as a Case

A Review and Analysis of Problems with Program Evaluation in Chinese Colleges and Universities

Research on Performance Evaluation of Land Consolation Projects and Its Difference Features Based on Satisfaction of Peasant Households Survey in East,Central and Western Regions in China

Assessing Television Programs:From Quantitative Analyses to Qualitative Researches

Thoughts on the Performance Evaluation of NSFC

Status quo,problems and policy recommendations on the management system and performance evaluation of public hospital in China

Construction Strategy of Evaluation Index System of Applied Scientific and Technological Achievements

Scholars, strategists or stakeholders? Competing rationalities and impact of performance evaluation for academic managers in Chinese universities

Improvement of Ideas to Develop the Nethodology and Practice of the Performance Evaluation for Disease Control and Prevention System