Abstract:A widely accepted theory is challenged in this paper. Foreign firms’ pricing premium from listing in the US was considered as a result of better regulation and protection of minority shareholders of the listed companies. This paper raises another viewpoint that the regulation clauses may not have been implemented as well as people used to think. The information asymmetry between the US regulators and the overseas firms creates the possibility that illegal activities such as forging documents and faking financial reports may not be discovered in time, especially when listing is through a non-IPO way like reverse merger transactions. As a result, the de facto poorly performed foreign companies also have a chance to list in the US exchanges by exaggerating their business performance in balance sheets and profit from selling stocks to American investors in the secondary market as long as their improper behaviors are not perceived by the regulators before listing. Therefore in contrast to what the existing literature has assumed, there are two types of foreign firms traded on the NYSE, Nasdaq and Amex: good firms with growth opportunities and bad firms which cheat the investors. As investors realize the existence of the bad firms, the problem becomes similar to the market of lemons. Price of the foreign stocks from countries with more information asymmetry, poorer legal enforcement and corporate governance could go down and the cross-listing premium may disappear. This paper uses firm-level accounting data of the Chinese stocks listed in the US exchanges and listed in the four stock markets in mainland China to prove the above hypothesis. Cross-listing discount, instead of premium, is found. Tobin’s q premium from listing in the US has been decreasing from year 2006 when the Chinese firms’ accounting fraud was first reported and finally turned to be negative. The widely reported financial fraud of the US-listed Chinese firms after 2010 proves the correctness of the aforementioned two-type-firm theory. Accordingly, the US-listed Chinese firms with more information disclosure are higher valuated, including firms listed via IPO rather than reverse merger, firms from large Chinese cities with better legal enforcement and easier verification of information authenticity, and large firms which are covered by more analysts and media. As for the hypothesis that bad companies prefer exaggerating their performance in financial reports, the historical data does show that the already delisted companies reported a much higher 12-month trailing EPS before their delisting. Moreover, when there is less information asymmetry and more information disclosure, price of the US-listed Chinese stocks goes up.

The impacts of mass delisting: Evidence from Singapore and Malaysia

Short Sales and Price Discovery of Chinese Cross-Listed Firms

Trading Location and Equity Returns: Evidence from US Trading of British Cross-Listed Firms

The effects of NASDAQ delisting on firm performance

Delisting regulation and corporate financialization: Evidence from China

Common Stock Delisting: An Empirical Analysis of Firms Performance

Consequences of earnings management triggered by delisting regulation: Evidence in China

Size Still Matters!

Price Impact of Derivatives Listing and Delisting: Evidence from India

How Cross-Listings from an Emerging Economy Affect the Host Market?

Delamination of information disclosure and stock price synchronicity — Evidence from China's NEEQ market

A Study on Sina’s Delisting under the Variable Interest Entity Structure Model: Motivations, Pathways, and Effects

Are Foreign Companies Listed in the US Really Worth More? Information Asymmetry and Cross-listing Discount of China Concepts Stocks

Are Stock Price More Informative after Dual-Listing in Emerging Markets? Evidence from Hong Kong-Listed Chinese Companies

Defending the shell: differential effects of delisting pressure on R&D intensity and bribery expenditure

The Competing-Risk Analysis of Post-IPO De-Listings

A Study on the Reasons and Effects of the Second Listing of Chinese Concept Stocks Base on Alibaba

Investor protection, cross-listing and accounting quality

Short seller report and stock performance Empirical evidence from US-listed Chinese firms

Effects of Short-Sale Constraints on Stock Prices and Trading Activity: Evidence from Hong Kong and Mainland China

Impact of Market Information Efficiency on Corporate Listing and Financing: Evidence from China