Application of Chelator-Buffered Nutrient Solution Technique in Studies on Zinc Nutrition in Rice Plant (Oryza-Sativa L)

X. Yang,V. Römheld,H. Marschner,R. L. Chaney
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00033944
IF: 4.993
1994-01-01
Plant and Soil
Abstract:It has been difficult to impose different degrees of Zn deficiency on Poaceae species in nutrient solution because most chelators which would control Zn to low activities also bind Fe3+ so strongly that Poaceae species cannot obtain adequate Fe. Recently, a method has been developed to provide buffered Fe2+ at levels adequate for rice using Ferrozine (FZ), and use of other chelators to buffer the other micronutrient cations. The use of Fe2+ buffered with FZ in nutrient solutions in which Zn is buffered with HEDTA or DTPA was evaluated for study of Zn deficiency in rice compared to a conventional nutrient solution technique. The results showed that growth of rice plants in FZ + HEDTA-buffered nutrient solution was similar to that in the conventional nutrient solution. Severe zinc deficiency symptoms were observed in 28-day-old rice seedlings cultured with HEDTA-buffered nutrient solution at Zn2+ activities < 10(-10.6) M. With increasing free Zn2+ activities, concentrations of Zn, Fe, Cu, and Mn in shoots and roots were quite similar for the FZ + HEDTA-buffered nutrient solution and the conventional nutrient solution techniques. The percentages of water soluble Zn, Fe, Cu and Mn in shoots with HEDTA-buffered nutrient solution were also similar to those with the conventional solution. However, with DTPA-buffered nutrient solution, the rice seedlings suffered severe Fe deficiency; adding more FeFZ(3) corrected the Fe-chlorosis but shifted microelement buffering. Further, much higher total Zn concentrations are required to provide adequate Zn2+ in DTPA-buffered solutions, and the contents of Mn and Cu in shoots and roots cultured with DTPA-buffered solutions were much higher than those with the conventional or HEDTA-buffered solutions. In conclusion, DTPA-buffered nutrient solutions are not suitable but the FZ/HEDTA-buffered nutrient solution technique can be used to evaluate genotypic differences in zinc efficiency in rice.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?