Study on Description Methods of Mass Segregation of Star Clusters

ER Xin-yue,JIANG Zhi-bo,FU Yan-ning
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1000-8349.2013.02.05
2013-01-01
Abstract:Mass segregation means that the higher-mass stars are preferably found in the center of a cluster,whereas the lower-mass stars in the outer region.Studying mass segregation can help us to understand the dynamical evolution of clusters and constrain initial conditions of massive stars.There are a few different methods of probing mass segregation(or luminosity segregation when the masses of member stars are not available).These methods can be classified into two categories.One is to investigate the difference between stellar mass/luminosity functions(MF/LF) of two or more subregions of a cluster.In order to determine whether these functions are different or not,besides direct comparison,one may make use of some characteristic quantities,e.g.the ratio of mean stellar masses of two different subregions(M).The other is to investigate the difference between the stellar number density profiles(n0–r) of two or more sets of stars within different mass ranges.In order to determine whether these profiles are different or not,besides direct comparison,one may make use of some characteristic quantities,e.g.the ratio of half-number radii,lengths of the minimum spanning tree(Λ),and mean stellar mutual distances(R).Some tips of these methods are summarized as follows: 1) Since massive stars are usually scarce and MF is a piecewise defined function,describing mass segregation by the slope of MF should be careful.2) M may be biased by the presence of a few massive stars.3) The n0–r of one cluster may be not universal.4) The ratio of half-number radii depends on the cluster center,while it is not the case for Λ and R.There is no predominant method to describe mass segregation.In simulation,authors often study the evolution of mass segregation as a function of time,so M and R are preferred.In observation,authors often analyze only one cluster,so LF and n0–r seem to be more appropriate.In addition,if the velocities of member stars are available,one may consider the correlation between velocities and stellar masses as well.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?