A Comparative Study on the Doctrines of Constitution of Crime

Huai-zhi CHU,Wei-jian GAO
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1001-2397.2009.06.08
2009-01-01
Abstract:While legal structures are essentially alike,different cultures have cultivated disparate doctrines of constitution of crime in German-Japanese,Anglo-American and Sino-Russian legal systems. The appearances,logical structures and cultural features of the doctrines of the three legal systems vary sharply,but generally they have similar basic functions and are respectively justified. The hoary doctrine of four elements of constitution of crime in China's criminal law has been verified of relative rationality both in logic and in practice,which shall not be supplanted with overall transplantation of the three-tier paradigm of German-Japanese or the double-tier paradigm of Anglo-American theory. Further clarifying and improving the internal structure of the four-element doctrine is an appropriate way to settle relevant theoretical disputes. To foster the value of rule of law in criminal justice,it is necessary for China to ensure that a holistic mechanism of criminal justice theories to be maintained.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?