Abstract:In the new millennium,two features have developed in China's macro-economy:The first is the close association of macroeconomic fluctuations with foreign demand shocks;the second is the addition of processing trade to the foreign demand structure and its eventual precedence over normal trade in gross value.Owing to the development of these two features,the classic International Real Business Cycles Theory has failed to explain China's macroeconomic fluctuation and meanwhile there has been little research on such a typical foreign demand structure.To fill the gap between theory and reality,this paper further categorizes the trade sector in the International Real Business Cycles Theory into processing trade and normal trade.Under such a categorization,two key assumptions are put forward:(1)the home elasticity of substitution for intermediate goods is relatively small in the processing trade sector;(2)the home value added for intermediate goods is relatively small in the processing trade sector.With these assumptions,two contradictory mechanisms of the home effect of foreign demand shocks emerge in partial equilibrium:Assumption 1 means that the processing trade sector is adjusted more readily in the case of foreign demand shocks;Assumption 2 means that it is adjusted less readily in that case.After calibrating and simulating the theoretical model,this paper examines the compound effect of the two contradictory mechanisms in general equilibrium.The results show that the foreign demand shocks in the processing trade sector more strongly affect China's investment and import/export,while those in the normal trade sector more strongly affect China's GDP.These results indicate a possible dilemma that the adjustment of China's foreign demand structure may encounter.In other words,the rise in the share of either the processing trade or normal trade will not reduce the influence of foreign demand shocks on China's macro-economy.The only difference lies in the fields affected most strongly by the shocks. As the model indicates,the dilemma in the macro-economy partially stems from the changes in China's foreign demand structure in the past decade,which reflects its comparative advantage in labor and technology in its participation in the global production process,a fundamental and constant fact.There is a need for greater tolerance for a more volatile Chinese macro-economy as it is the result of the encounter of economic fundamentals and globalization.It is necessary to explore new ways to reduce the volatility of Chinese economy,such as seeking bigger control in the global value chain and diversifying foreign markets.This paper is an attempt to incorporate China's foreign demand structure into an international real business cycle model,with the quantity characteristics of the processing trade and normal trade as the starting points of modeling.Future research may examine the links between different stages of the processing trade,which means that if one link in the supply of intermediate goods is affected,the whole production will be affected(the most famous example is the 2011 Fukushima earthquake,which led to an abrupt stop in the global semi-conductor industry).

Compelled Technological Change,Unbalanced Growth,and China's Business Cycle

The “Growth-First Strategy” and the Imbalance Between Consumption and Investment in China

Chinese Political and Economic Governance System and the Imbalance Between Consumption and Investment

Biased Technical Change,Habit Formation and Real Business Cycle in China:A Study on a RBC Model

China's economic and trade development: Imbalance to equilibrium

AGGREGATE DEMAND STRUCTURE ADJUSTMENT AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PATTERN TRANSFORMATION

Processing Trade,Normal Trade and the Transmission Channels of Foreign Demand Shock

What Drives China's Business Cycle Fluctuations?

The External factors of Economic Fluctuations in China:1992-2008

Dual Binary Transition and Structural Adjustment: Model,Propositions,and Evidence from China

China's Business Cycles: Perspectives from an AD-AS Model

Business Cycle Asymmetry in China:Evidence from Friedman’s Plucking Model

Habit Formation,Borrowing Constraints and the Real Business Cycle in China:An Empirical Study on a RBC Model

Structural Change and Economic Growth in China

Growing Like China

Perspectives from an AD-AS Model

Government Spending,Liquidity Shocks and Real Business Cycle in China

Determinants of China’s Structural Change During the Reform Era

Cost Distortions and Structural Imbalances in China

Business Cycle Asymmetry in China: Evidence from Friedmanâ€™s Plucking Model

Can China’s Growth be Sustained? A Productivity Perspective