Abstract:The validity of corporate governance should be reflected not only by improving corporate performance,but also by stabilizing the variability of corporate performance.In this paper,we argue that executives can only impact firm outcomes if they have influence over crucial decisions.Based on this idea we develop and test two key hypotheses about:(1) how CEO power to influence decisions will affect firm performance variability;(2) whether the effect of CEO power on corporate performance variability has been affected by corporate environment,especially by information disclosure quality.Based on the sample data of SZSE's listed companies from 2004 to 2008,this paper empirically tests the relations between CEO power,information disclosure quality and corporate performance variability.The research results show:(1) CEO power is positively associated with corporate performance(measured by ROA and Tobin's Q) and corporate performance variability,it indicates CEO power is a double-edged sword.(2) Corporate performance variability is significantly affected by information disclosure quality of the listed companies.And the effect of CEO power on corporate performance variability has been reduced by improving information disclosure quality.(3) by analyzing ownership characteristic of listed corporate,this paper finds that the effect of CEO power on corporate performance variability in the state owned firms is higher than that of in the non-state owned firms and the effect that CEO power' role on corporate performance variability has been reduced by improving information disclosure quality is stronger in the state owned firms than that of in the non-state owned firms.To sum up,the results are robust across various tests designed to detect differences in variability,and to concerns about the endogeneity of CEO power.Thus,more powerful CEOs appear to have a greater impact on corporate decision-making,producing greater variability in the realized outcomes of these decisions and the effect of CEO power on corporate performance variability has been weakened by information disclosure quality of the listed companies.

Board Independence and Corporate Performance：the Moderating Effect of CEO Power

Board Leadership Structure and Corporate Governance—Evidence from CEO Turnovers in China' s Listed Firms

Board Independence, Ownership Concentration and Corporate Performance - Chinese Evidence

On the Moderating Effects of Country Governance on the Relationships between Corporate Governance and Firm Performance

Performance Evaluation Mechanism and CEO Turnover——Evidence Based on Different Ultimate Ownership in China's Lasted Firms

CEO Power,Information Disclosure Quality and Corporate Performance Variability:Empirical Evidence from the Listed Companies in SZSE

Differences in Board Independence’s Impact on ESG with Respect to Power Constraints: Evidence from a Heterogeneity Perspective

Independence on the Board of Directors, Ownership Centralization and Corporate Performance in China:Study Based on Structural Equation Model

Functional Diversity in Top Management Team and Firm Performance:The Moderating Role of CEO Power

An Empirical Research on the Relationship Between Board of Directors Governance and Corporate Performance of Chinese Public Companies

CEO power on corporate performance in Chinese market

Corporate Performance Based on Single-index Semi-parametric Methods

The Impact of CEO Duality and Ownership on the Relationship Between Organisational Slack and Firm Performance in China

Board Structure, Political Influence and Firm Performance - an Empirical Study on Publicly Listed Firms in China

Executive political connections and firm performance: Comparative evidence from privately-controlled and state-owned enterprises

CEO Overconfidence,Board Structure and Firm Performance

Corporate Leadership Structure and Management Turnover:Evidence from Public Corporate in China

Board structure and Corporate Performance: Causes and Consequences

CEO Duality, Organizational Slack, and Firm Performance in China

The Impact of CEO Duality and Financial Performance on CSR Disclosure: Empirical Evidence from State-Owned Enterprises in China

Ownership Structure, Independent Directors with Overseas Background and Corporate Performance ——evidence from Listed Companies in Shanghai Stock Exchange