Abstract:The tumor suppressor p53 is required for induction of its downstream effector genes such as GADD45 and CIP1/WAF1 by ionizing radiation (IR), This response is probably mediated through defined p53 binding sites located in the promoter of CIP1/WAF1 and in the third intron of GADD45. In contrast, the gadd gene stress response to base-damaging agents, such as methylmethane sulfonate (MMS) or UV radiation, or medium depletion (starvation) occurs in all mammalian cells examined to date regardless of p53 status for both GADD45 and also GADD153, which is not IR-responsive in many lines with functional p53, These agents strongly induce the p53 protein and raise the possibility that, although p53 is not required for the typical ''gadd'' response to these agents, p53 may contribute to these non-IR stress responses, This possibility was confirmed by the finding that disruption of p53 function by transfection with dominant-negative vectors expressing HPV E6, mutant p53, or SV40 T Ag reduced the induction of GADD45 and GADD153 as measured by increases in mRNA and protein levels in human lines with wild-type p53, Similarly, induction of these genes by MMS or UV radiation was consistently stronger in the parental mouse embryo fibroblasts compared to cells derived from mice where both p53 alleles had been deleted, Similar qualitative responses were also seen for CIP1/WAF1. In agreement with reduced induction of p53-regulated genes, the G(1) checkpoint activated by MMS or UV radiation was markedly abrogated in p53-wt human MCF-7 breast carcinoma cells by E6 expression, Interestingly, induction of reporter constructs driven by the GADD45 or GADD153 promoters was substantially reduced in human cells transfected with mutant p53 or E6 expression vectors or in cells lacking p53 following treatment with MMS, UV radiation, or starvation, Because neither promoter is inducible by IR, and neither contains a strong p53 binding site, these results indicate that p53 has a synergistic or cooperative role in these non-IR stress responses for both GADD45 and GADD153, and that this role is not mediated through identifiable p53-binding sites.

Defective Induction but Normal Activation and Function of P53 in Mouse Cells Lacking Poly-Adp-ribose Polymerase.

Inhibition of Nonsense-Mediated Decay Rescues P53β/γ Isoform Expression and Activates the P53 Pathway in MDM2-overexpressing and Select P53-Mutant Cancers

Inhibition of Nonsense-Mediated Decay Rescues Functional P53β/γ Isoforms in MDM2-amplified Cancers

Inhibition of nonsense-mediated decay rescues p53/ isoform expression and activates the p53 pathway in and select-mutant cancers

DNA-dependent Protein Kinase-independent Activation of p53 in Response to DNA Damage

PARP is important for genomic stability but dispensable in apoptosis

Poly(ADP-Ribose) Polymerase-1 Lacking Enzymatic Activity Is Not Compatible with Mouse Development

P53 Transcriptional Activity is Essential for P53-Dependent Apoptosis Following DNA Damage

Inactive PARP1 causes embryonic lethality and genome instability in a dominant-negative manner

Parg deficiency confers radio-sensitization through enhanced cell death in mouse ES cells exposed to various forms of ionizing radiation

Augmented cancer resistance and DNA damage response phenotypes in PPM1D null mice.

Adaptive genetic mechanisms in mammalian Parp1 locus

Abrogation Of P53 Function Affects Gadd Gene Responses To Dna Base-Damaging Agents And Starvation

P53-Mediated DNA Repair Responses to UV Radiation: Studies of Mouse Cells Lacking P53, P21, And/orgadd45 Genes

Puma is Required for P53-Induced Depletion of Adult Stem Cells

Mutation of Mouse P53 Ser23 and the Response to Dna Damage

p53 regulates diverse tissue-specific outcomes to endogenous DNA damage in mice

The DNA-binding and Transcription-Activation Abilities of P53 Are Necessary but Not Sufficient for Its Antiproliferation Function.

Dna Damage-Induced Apoptosis Requires the Dna-Dependent Protein Kinase, and is Mediated by the Latent Population of P53

Mice Lacking P21 CIP1/WAF1 Undergo Normal Development, but Are Defective in G1 Checkpoint Control

Cell Type- and Promoter-specific Roles of Ser18 Phosphorylation in Regulating p53 Responses