Abstract:According to new economic geography,this paper analyzes the changes of centripetal and centrifugal forces from the view of influencing factors using static and dynamic methods.The resultant force of centripetal and centrifugal forces in different regions is different,the driving force of industrial transfer comes from comparative advantage of the resultant force.TFP(total factor productivity) is the substitution variables of the resultant force.Technology,institutional,specialized mode and innovation factors are influencing factors of TFP,the flow rate of the influencing factors is faster than the labor mobility.The ratio of capital to labor is relatively stable,the speed of labor mobility restricts the productivity of the production portfolio,the adjustment speed of the production factor productivity lags behind TFP adjustment speed.Therefore,we draw an important conclusion: The decision basis for spatial location selection is based on TFP changes rather than changes of resource allocation efficiency. On the statistics data of China's manufacturing enterprises in 2001～2009,we use a semi-parametric estimation method to measure TFP.Through a deeply TFP comparative analysis between textile industries and other industries in China's eastern,central and western regions,we find that the intrinsic motivation of China's textile industry from the east to the Midwest has been appeared in 2001 and strengthened year by year from 2001 to 2007.In fact,contrary to the direction of the intrinsic dynamic action,in 2001～2007 textile industries transfer is from the Midwest to the east,spatial allocation efficiency of production factors is rising.In 2007～2009 textile industries transfer is from the east to the Midwest,spatial allocation efficiency of production factors shows a downward trend from 2007 to 2009.Further studies show that: China's textile industry transfer of the inverse driving force in 2001～2007,lose the opportunity to obtain higher spatial allocation efficiency,there is a decision loss.In 2007～2009,spatial allocation efficiency of production factors is decline mainly because 2001～2007 textile industry inverse transfer is the incremental transfer rather than stock transfer.The incremental transfer increases the investment scale of entire textile industry,relative surplus of the investment scale in 2007～2009 is the main reason for decline of spatial resources allocation efficiency. Our results show that industrial transfer is not a simple device migration,but transfer of the ability and opportunity.Because the market price changes lag behind TFP changes,market price mechanism can not immediately react to this information when the intrinsic motivation of industrial transfer appeared.In addition,the enterprise exists multiple enterprise heterogeneity in the level of management,risk preferences,information processing ability,a large number of micro decision-making enterprises rely solely on market information to capture the opportunity of industry transfer with a lag.Enterprise multi-heterogeneity is the main reason for independent decision-making companies without the same decision-making on driving force.Since the industry transfer information of market mechanisms capturing is sub-optimal information,there is a decision loss relying solely on market mechanisms.If the government can not develop an effective industry transfer policy to make up for market information failures,would not eliminate the loss of opportunities for decision-making of spatial resources allocation efficiency in the industrial transfer.Therefore,some effective external policies are still needed to quicken the mass transferring process by developing appropriate policies to reduce the opportunities loss for decision-making of the spatial resources allocation efficiency and focusing on the coordinated development of human capital,physical capital,technology and financial markets.

The models of undertaking industrial transfer based on dynamic factors of enterprise migration

Study on International Entrepreneurial Strategy of SMEs from Perspective of Dynamic Capability Theory:Based on Cases from Zhejiang

Research on the Influencing Factors, Paths and Effects of Chinese Enterprises' Internationalization Strategy

The Upgrading Mechanism of OEM Based on the Technology Heterogeneity Transfer

Will the Local Government Need to "do Something" in the Industrial Transfer?——Based on the Development of the Model of Heterogeneity Enterprises

Empirical Analysis on the Dynamical Mechanism of Industrial Transfer from the View of New Economic Geography——A Case Study on the Textile Industry

Motivation for Firm Relocation: Research Based on Content Analysis

Influencing Factors and Case Study of Knowledge Transfer in Inter-firm Networks

Research on technology transfer from multinational corporation to host country enterprise based on duplicated and dynamic evolutional theory

Regional industrial transfer in the Jingjinji urban agglomeration, China: An analysis based on a new “transferring area-undertaking area-dynamic process” model

Dynamic Mechanism Research of Corporate Organization and Business Model Innovation: The Example of a New Generation of Information Technology Enterprises

Dynamic Models of Technology Management Capability Development Based on Knowledge Diffusion

Game Analysis on the Chinese Enterprise Technology Transfer Model

Study on the Dynamic Modeling Methods for Die ＆ Mould Enterprises

Factory Relocation of Global Manufacturing Enterprises: A Case Study

The Analyses of Industrial Hollowing - out with Industrial Structure Upgrading and Industrial Transfer

Comparison of export and outward foreign direct investment models of Chinese enterprises based on quantitative algorithm

Why Do the Inefficient Companies Choose to Go Abroad: A View Angle of Dynamic Efficiency

The Transfer Strategy of Digital Information Technology for Heterogeneous Manufacturers

Does Institutional Embeddedness Promote Regional Enterprises’ Migration? An Empirical Analysis Based on the “Double Transfer” Strategy in Guangdong, China

Research on Enterprise Transformation from the Perspective of Dynamic Capability: From Market-Driven to Market-Driving