A prospective multicenter study on the rehabilitation pattern for post-surgery patients with the elbow fracture
Tao LI,Mou-wang ZHOU,Shu-xun HOU,Xin-bao WU,Yun TIAN,Gao-yan LA,Jing-yu LIU,Ling LI,Jin-shu TANG,Jia-liang ZHU,Xian-feng GUO,Yan-wei L,Chun-de LI,Ning-hua WANG,Yu-xiao XIE,Peng LIN,Zhong-shi LI,Yong HAI,Hui ZHAO,Qing-yun XUE,Xin GU,Hua-song MA,Ming LU,Yuan-zheng MA,Da-wei LI
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.2095-252X.2016.04.005
2016-01-01
Abstract:Objective To evaluate the outcomes of different rehabilitation patterns for patients who have undergone a surgery for elbow fracture, and to put forward a suitable rehabilitation pattern for post-surgery patients with the elbow fracture.Methods A total of 129 cases receiving surgery for the elbow fracture in 9 hospitals inBeijing were divided into two groups: ( 1 ) the control group: received common orthopedic rehabilitation; ( 2 ) the observation group: received post-surgery rehabilitation in team approach. Visual analogue scale ( VAS ) and range of motion ( ROM ) were assessed 5 days, 12 weeks and 24 weeks after the surgery. The hospital for special surgery score ( HSS ) was assessed 12 weeks and 24 weeks after the surgery.Results There were no statistically significant differences in VAS ( the observation group at 5 days, 12 weeks and 24 weeks after the surgery were 3.94 ± 2.12, 1.04 ± 1.46 and 0.38 ± 0.76; the control group at 5 days, 12 weeks and 24 weeks after the surgery were 3.12 ± 1.54, 1.12 ± 1.28 and 0.75 ± 1.12 ), lfexion ( the observation group at 5 days, 12 weeks and 24 weeks after the surgery were ( 72.07 ± 28.08 ) °, ( 107.55 ± 24.11 ) ° and ( 120.40 ± 22.56 ) °; the control group at 5 days, 12 weeks and 24 weeks after the surgery were ( 68.24 ± 28.29 ) °, ( 107.50 ± 20.64 ) ° and ( 117.82 ± 18.66 ) °, and extension [ the observation group at 5 days, 12 weeks and 24 weeks after the surgery were ( 18.97 ± 18.68 ) °, ( 15.59 ± 17.51 ) ° and ( 10.51 ± 14.66 ) °; the control group at 5 days, 12 weeks and 24 weeks after the surgery were ( 17.54 ± 25.34 ) °, ( 18.24 ± 22.43 ) ° and ( 14.27 ± 23.99 ) ° ] (P > 0.05 ). The forearm pronation: the observation group 5 days and 12 weeks after the surgery were ( 51.50 ± 30.95 ) ° and ( 77.76 ± 13.23 ) °; the control group 5 days and 12 weeks after the surgery were ( 42.22 ± 29.67 ) ° and ( 74.55 ± 18.52 ) °. The supination: the observation group 5 days and 12 weeks after the surgery were ( 47.00 ± 30.92 ) ° and ( 77.14 ± 15.67 ) °; the control group 5 days and 12 weeks after the surgery were ( 41.50 ± 30.31 ) ° and ( 71.98 ± 21.99 ) °. No significant differences existed (P > 0.05 ). The observation group showed signiifcantly better rotation in the rage of motion ( ROM ) 24 weeks after the surgery [ the pronation and supination of the observation group were ( 83.06 ± 7.41 ) ° and ( 82.77 ± 7.65 ) °; the pronation and supination of control group were ( 78.30 ± 14.59 ) ° and ( 73.56 ± 22.67 ) ° ] (P= 0.035,P = 0.005 ). HSS 12 weeks after the operation: the observation group ( 77.00 ± 15.06 ) points and the control group ( 68.14 ± 19.35 ) points; no statistical signiifcance (P > 0.05 ). HSS 24 weeks after the operation: the observation group ( 89.73 ± 9.17 ) points and the control group ( 78.57 ± 20.39 ) points; the observation group was superior to the control group ( P = 0.015 ).Conclusions The rehabilitation in team approach improves functions than common orthopedic rehabilitation. It is suitable for early post-surgery rehabilitation of the elbow fracture.