Abstract:figure legend Just as a tuning knob provides incremental adjustability that is easily accessible and readily reversible, replication slippage at tandem‐repetitive DNA provides a practically inexhaustible supply of abundant variation with minimal cost to fitness. This is an example of a 'mutation protocol', a genetic pattern implementing a bet‐hedging strategy against the ever‐present risk posed by environmental uncertainty – a function analogous to that provided by sexual reproduction. Constraints imposed by mutation protocols minimize risk so that mutations with a reasonable probability for beneficial effect can be more freely and abundantly produced. Mutation protocols can perhaps be best understood as the product of selection at the level of populations, although gene‐level selection may be adequate. Because the universe of possible DNA sequences is inconceivably vast, organisms have evolved mechanisms for exploring DNA sequence space while substantially reducing the hazard that would otherwise accrue to any process of random, accidental mutation. One such mechanism is meiotic recombination. Although sexual reproduction imposes a seemingly paradoxical 50% cost to fitness, sex evidently prevails because this cost is outweighed by the advantage of equipping offspring with genetic variation to accommodate environmental vicissitudes. The potential adaptive utility of additional mechanisms for producing genetic variation has long been obscured by a presumption that the vast majority of mutations are deleterious. Perhaps surprisingly, the probability for adaptive variation can be increased by several mechanisms that generate mutations abundantly. Such mechanisms, here called 'mutation protocols', implement implicit 'constraints that deconstrain'. Like meiotic recombination, they produce genetic variation in forms that minimize potential for harm while providing a reasonably high probability for benefit. One example is replication slippage of simple sequence repeats (SSRs); this process yields abundant, reversible mutations, typically with small quantitative effect on phenotype. This enables SSRs to function as adjustable 'tuning knobs'. There exists a clear pathway for SSRs to be shaped through indirect selection favouring their implicit tuning‐knob protocol. Several other molecular mechanisms comprise probable components of additional mutation protocols. Biologists might plausibly regard such mechanisms of mutation not primarily as sources of deleterious genetic mistakes but also as potentially adaptive processes for 'exploring' DNA sequence space.

Role of Duplicate Genes in Genetic Robustness Against Null Mutations.

Feature Identification of Compensatory Gene Pairs Without Sequence Homology in Yeast

Effect of Duplicate Genes on Mouse Genetic Robustness: an Update.

Expression attenuation as a mechanism of robustness against gene duplication

Compensatory ability to null mutation in metabolic networks.

Robust Regulatory Networks

A genome wide dosage suppressor network reveals genetic robustness and a novel mechanism for Huntington's disease

Point Mutations of Homologs As an Adaptive Solution to the Gene Loss.

Gene network robustness as a multivariate character

Pathway knockout and redundancy in metabolic networks.

Coregulation of tandem duplicate genes slows evolution of subfunctionalization in mammals

Upstream plasticity and downstream robustness in evolution of molecular networks

Tackling redundancy: genetic mechanisms underlying paralog compensation in plants.

Two Major Paths of Gene-Duplicates Evolution

Emergent Network Structure, evolvable Robustness and non-linear Effects of Point Mutations in an Artificial Genome Model

Genes involved in protein folding and chromatin organization buffer genetic variation

Predictive Models of Genetic Redundancy in Arabidopsis thaliana

Subfunctionalization Reduces the Fitness Cost of Gene Duplication in Humans by Buffering Dosage Imbalances.

The fate of genes after duplication

Network Structure and Dynamics, and Emergence of Robustness by Stabilizing Selection in an Artificial Genome

Mutation protocols share with sexual reproduction the physiological role of producing genetic variation within 'constraints that deconstrain'