Abstract:Many large ticket items, such as cars and real estate, involve extensive bargaining on the part of consumers. From a consumer protection perspective, it is thus important to understand the determinants of bargaining outcomes and identify ways in which consumers can improve their bargaining performance. This research identifies several situational factors, including the information available to the consumer, the promotional environment, and a customer’s trade-in, that may have an impact on the bargaining outcome. A unique dataset is created from the US automobile market that combines actual vehicle transaction data with survey data on buyer search and bargaining behaviour. The results show that these situational variables indeed have an impact on the price a consumer pays. Specifically, on average, consumers who used the Internet and those that were offered a manufacturer rebate saved $481 and $2,126, respectively, while consumers who traded-in their old vehicle ended up paying $159 more on the new car compared to consumers who did not trade-in. Interestingly, the impact of some of these situational variables differed depending on the consumers’ ability to bargain and their enjoyment of bargaining. For example, high ability bargainers achieved more price reductions than low ability bargainers, given more information and a more active promotional environment, but this advantage did not extend in overcoming the negative impact of a trade-in. On the other hand, while buyers who enjoy bargaining do not possess a better position in a bargaining situation, they have greater tendency to search for price information and thus are better at identifying suppliers that offer a lower initial price. From a policy perspective, these results suggest that information search should be encouraged and made easier, particularly for consumers who dislike bargaining. Furthermore, even if some consumers have a high bargaining ability, there are still circumstances where their ability to get a lower price is limited. Education that highlights these pitfalls is likely to improve the final bargaining outcome and thus enhance consumer welfare.

THE COMPETITIVE IMPLICATIONS OF A "NO-HAGGLE" PRICING POLICY: THE ACCESS TOYOTA CASE

The Competitive Implications of A "No-Haggle" Pricing Strategy when Others Negotiate: Findings from A Natural Experiment

The Effects of a “No-Haggle” Channel on Marketing Strategies

How Good Are You at Getting a Lower Price? A Field Study of the US Automobile Market

Pricing strategy for the automobile producer considering consumer anxiety behavior and policy substitution effect

Collusion and Price War of Automobile Industry in China

Price Advertising by Manufacturers and Dealers.

Increasing information transparency : implications of consumer price posting for consumers' behavior and a seller's pricing strategy

How Market Power Affects Dynamic Pricing: Evidence from Inventory Fluctuations at Car Dealerships

Collusion or Competition? Interfirm Relationships in the Chinese Auto Industry

Pricing research for automotive supply chains considering low-carbon consumer preferences under a dual policy

The pricing strategies behind New Energy Vehicles price war: Taking Tesla and XPeng as examples

The Determinants of Dealership Structure: Empirical Analysis of the Chinese Auto Market

Price-Competition and Compatibility in the Presence of Positive Demand Externalities

Is Personalized Pricing Profitable When Firms Can Differentiate?

Invest in Information or Wing It? A Model of Dynamic Pricing with Seller Learning

Vehicle Quota System and Its Impact on the Chinese Auto Markets: A Tale of Two Cities

Analysis and Game Study of Tesla's Pricing Strategy Based on Consumer Purchase

Tariff Protection, Product Differentiation and Market Conduct

Local Protectionism, Market Structure, and Social Welfare: China’s Automobile Market

Competition-Based Dynamic Pricing in Online Retailing: A Methodology Validated with Field Experiments