Abstract:Purpose Percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy has been increasingly used in the treatment of lumbar disc herniation. However, there is no consensus on which method would be more effective between the transforaminal and interlaminar approach. Objective To compare clinical outcomes, patient satisfaction rate, reoperation rate, and residual symptoms between percutaneous endoscopic transforaminal discectomy (PETD) and percutaneous endoscopic interlaminar discectomy (PEID). Study design A comparative, retrospective, controlled trial. Setting The study was conducted at the Department of Orthopaedics at a local hospital. Methods From January 2015 to September 2020, consecutive patients who underwent PETD or PEID treatment for lumbar disk herniation (LDH) at the L5/S1 level in our department were retrospectively collected. Baseline data including age, gender, body mass index (BMI), smoking status, alcohol drinking, clinical symptoms, physical examination, and radiographic characteristics were documented. During the two to three year follow-up periods, patients were evaluated clinically, including clinical outcomes assessed by the visual analog score (VAS), patient satisfaction rates assessed by the North American Spine Society patient satisfaction index (PSI), recurrent rate, and residual symptoms. Results A total of 113 patients with PELD in our department were included in the current study, with 65 patients in the PETD group and 48 in the PEID group. Demographic characteristics including age, gender, height, BMI, cigarette smoking, alcohol consumption status, and diabetes did not show any significant difference between the PETD and PEID groups. The VAS scores of the two groups were similar preoperatively, but the postoperative VAS score of the PEID group was lower than that of the PETD group. There were 90.8% of patients in the PETD group who were satisfied with the operation compared to 97.9% in the PEID group. The recurrence rate did not differ between groups, with three patients in both groups. Regarding residual symptoms, there were more patients in the PETD group who reported low back pain during the follow-up periods. Limitation The main limitations are that all patients were operated by the same surgical team from the same site, and there was a lack of multicenter data. Conclusion Both PETD and PEID have satisfactory patient-reported outcomes for treating LDH. The PEID procedure results in fewer low back pain residual symptoms than the PELD procedure.

Short-term outcomes of percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy for the treatment of lumbar disc herniation in 30 patients

Therapeutic effect analysis of targeted percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy for lumbar disc herniation

The Clinical Effect of Percutaneous Transforaminal Endoscopic Discectomy in the Treatment of Low Lumbar Single Segment Disc Herniation

Clinical application of microendoscopic discectomy for the treatment of lumbar disc herniation

Clinical Outcomes of Percutaneous Endoscopic Transforaminal Discectomy for the Treatment of Disc Herniation: A 3-Year Retrospective Study

Efficacy of Percutaneous Transforaminal Endoscopic Discectomy for the Treatment of Patients Undergoing Lumbar Disc Herniation With Positive Nerve Root Sedimentation Sign: a Retrospective Case-Control Study

Percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy for different types of lumbar disc herniation: A retrospective study

Treatment of Upper Lumbar Disc Herniation with a Transforaminal Endoscopic Technique

Evaluation of efficacy and safety of percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic surgery (PTES) for surgical treatment of calcified lumbar disc herniation: a retrospective cohort study of 101 patients

A New Technique of Percutaneous Transforaminal Endoscopic Surgery for Lumbar Disc Herniation After Previous Intervention

CT evaluation of treating lumbar disc herniation by CT-guided percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy

The technique and efficacy of percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic surgery for surgical treatment of L5/S1 disc herniation

[Treatment of lumbar intervertebral disc herniation and sciatica with percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic technique].

Clinical comparison of percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy and unilateral biportal endoscopic discectomy for single-level lumbar disc herniation

Analysis of the Characteristics and Clinical Outcomes of Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy for Upper Lumbar Disc Herniation

The Strategy and Early Clinical Outcome of Percutaneous Full-Endoscopic Interlaminar or Extraforaminal Approach for Treatment of Lumbar Disc Herniation

Outcomes of percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy via a translaminar approach, especially for soft, highly down-migrated lumbar disc herniation

TREATMENT OF SENILE LUMBAR INTERVERTEBRAL DISC HERNIATION USING CT GUIDED PERCUTANEOUS TRANSFORAMINAL ENDOSCOPY

Comparative Analysis of Patient-Reported Outcomes after Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy Between Transforaminal and Interlaminar Approach: a Minimum Two Year Follow-Up.

Treatment of multi-level lumbar disc herniation with percutaneous endoscopic technique through ;transforaminal approach

[Treatment of displacement-type lumbar intervertebral disc protrusion on L2-L5 with percutaneous endoscopic interlaminar discectomy]