Abstract:Background:Epidural anesthesia used in percutaneous endoscopic lumber discectomy (PELD) has the risk of complete neurotactile block. Patients cannot timely respond to the operator when the nerve is touched by mistake, so the potential risk of nerve injury cannot be avoided. According to pharmacodynamics, with the decrease of local anesthetic concentration, the nerve tactile gradually recovered; however, the analgesic effect also gradually weakened. Therefore, it is necessary to explore an appropriate concentration of local anesthetics that can keep the patients' nerve touch without pain. By comparing the advantages and disadvantages of 0.4% ropivacaine epidural anesthesia, local anesthesia and intravenous anesthesia on intraoperative circulation fluctuation, the incidence of salvage analgesia and the incidence of nerve non-touch, the feasibility of using low concentration epidural anesthesia in PELD to obtain enough analgesia and avoid the risk of nerve injury was confirmed.Methods:153 cases of intervertebral foramen surgery from October 2017 to January 2020 were selected and divided into local anesthesia group (LA group), 0.4% ropivacaine epidural anesthesia group (EA group), and intravenous anesthesia group (IVA group) according to different anesthesia methods. The changes of blood pressure and heart rate, the incidence of rescue analgesia and nerve root non-touch were compared among the three groups.Results:The difference of map peak value among the three groups was statistically significant (P < 0.001); pairwise comparison showed that the map peak value of the LA group was higher than that of the EA group (P < 0.001) and IVA group (P < 0.001), but there was no statistical significance between the EA group and IVA group. The difference of HR peak value among the three groups was statistically significant; pairwise comparison showed that the HR peak value of the LA group was higher than that of the EA group (P < 0.001) and IVA group (P < 0.001), but there was no statistical significance between the EA group and IVA group. There was significant difference in the incidence of intraoperative hypertension among the three groups (P < 0.05); pairwise comparison showed that the incidence of intraoperative hypertension in the EA group was lower than that in the LA group (P < 0.05), while there was no significant difference between the IVA group, EA group, and LA group. There was significant difference in the incidence of rescue analgesia among the three groups (P < 0.01); pairwise comparison showed that the incidence of rescue analgesia in the EA group was lower than that in the LA group (P < 0.05) and IVA group (P < 0.05), but there was no significant difference between the LA group and IVA group. Due to the different analgesic mechanisms of the three anesthesia methods, local anesthesia and intravenous anesthesia do not cause the loss of nerve tactile, while the incidence of nerve tactile in 0.4% ropivacaine epidural anesthesia is only 2.4%, which is still satisfactory.Conclusion:Epidural anesthesia with 0.4% ropivacaine is a better anesthesia method for PELD. It not only has a low incidence of non-tactile nerve, but also has perfect analgesia and more stable intraoperative circulation.

Lumbar plexus combined sciatic nerve block with ropivacaine with different concentrations

Application of ropivacaine for combined spinal-epidural labor analgesia

Pharmacokinetics of different concentration of ropivacaine following lumbar plexus combined with sciatic nerve block

Effect Analysis of Epidural Anesthesia with 0.4% Ropivacaine in Transforaminal Endoscopic Surgery.

Ultrasound-guided modified thoracolumbar interfascial plane block in posterior lumbar decompression and fusion

Determining the Minimum Effective Concentration of Ropivacaine in Epidural Anesthesia for Tolerable Pain in Transforaminal Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy to Avoid Nerve Injury: A Double-Blind Study Using a Biased-Coin Design.

Effects of varying concentrations of ropivacaine on pain relief in ultrasound-guided brachial plexus block surgery in the intercostal space

Effects of a fixed low-dose ropivacaine with different volume and concentrations on interscalene brachial plexus block: a randomized controlled trial

Clinical study of lumbar plexus/sciatic nerve block using peripheral nerve stimulator and epidural anesthesia in the lower extremity surgery in elderly patients

Lumbosacral plexus nerve block directed by peripheral stimulator in critical patients undergoing lower-extremity surgery

A Comparison of 0.5% Ropivacaine and 1% Mepivacaine for Sciatic Nerve Block in the Popliteal Fossa

Different Concentrations of Ropivacaine under Ultrasound Guidance on Quadratus Lumbar Muscle Nerve Block in Elderly Patients with Hip Replacement

Effects of Ropivacaine Concentration on Analgesia After Ultrasound-Guided Serratus Anterior Plane Block: A Randomized Double-Blind Trial

Comparison of the efficacy of ultrasound guided interscalene brachial plexus block with 0.5% ropivacaine hydrochloride and 0.596% ropivacaine mesylate

The Clinic Test of 0.75% Ropivacaine Used in Combined Spinal-Epidural Block for Renal Transplation Operation

Comparison of efficacy of ropivacaine and bupivacaine for spinal anesthesia in patients undergoing unilateral lower limb surgery:a prospective,multicenter,randomized,double-blind study

The Median Effective Analgesic Concentration of Ropivacaine in Sciatic Nerve Block Guided by Ultrasound After Arthroscopic Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Double-Blind Up-Down Concentration-Finding Study

Comparison Between Ropivacaine and Ropivacaine Combined with Clonidine for Spinal Anaesthesia

Clinic Study on Separating Blockage of Sensory Nerve with Ropivacaine During Labor

Can Ropivacaine Be Effectively and Safely Used in Analgesia after Laparoscopically Assisted Gastrointestinal Surgery?

Efficacy of Continuous Fascia Iliaca Compartment Block with Different Concentrations of Ropivacaine for Postoperative Analgesia in Patients Undergoing Total Hip Arthroplasty