Abstract:This article reviews the multitude of individual fectors in empirical studies of ethical decision-making. Variables related to an individual decision maker examined in this review are gender, philosophy, 3E (Education, Employment and Experience), cultural values, age, personality, cognitive moral development, awareness, religion and locus of control. This review identifies the individual variables that have been empirically tested in an effort to uncover what is known and what we need to know about the factors that are hypothesized as determinants of ethical decision makers in the enterprise.Keywords: Ethical decision making, individual factors, review, cognitive moral development, personality.IntroductionEmployees' unethical behavior may harm the organizational image and reputation and cause the organization serious losses. Some employees' unethical behavior can even ruin the successful organization. In order to improve the management, managers need to know what affect the employees to make unethical decisions.There are several important theories in ethical decision-making research. The most prevalent model is Rest's four-component model22. Rest's original framework views ethical decision-making as four basic components - identifying the moral nature of an issue, making a moral judgment, establishing moral intent and engaging in moral action. Most of prior empirical studies viewed Rest's four stages as the dependent variables and the independent variables were individual factors, organizational factors and moral intensity factors.Individual factors include demographic variables and various psychological variables, which are uniquely associated with the individual decision maker. The demographic variables have received by far the most research attention in the empirical literature as shown in table 1.GenderGender received the most attention overall-113 findings across all four of Rest's dependent variables (Table 1). Of these, 35 of studies determined no significant gender differences12 while 38 other studies found that females are likely to act more ethically than males9. However, a few researchers found that men were stricter21 and more consistent17 than women when making ethical decisions. Mixed results for the impact of gender on ethical decision-making were found in the previous literature review. The bulk of studies indicated that gender does not usually affect the ethical decision making and if there is difference, women are more ethical than men.PhilosophyThe second group of individual factors reported in the empirical literature on ethical decision making focuses on philosophy and value orientation. There were a total of 95 findings. Various theories for ethical decision-making were tested such as justice, deontology, relativism, idealism, utilitarianism and egoism. Some studies examined the differences between idealism and relativism. Callanan et al4 found that individuals with a higher degree of idealism were more likely to choose more ethical options than those who displayed a lower degree of idealism. Valentine and Bateman33 found that individuals with career aspirations in business were more likely to recognize a moral issue in a sales context when they were using an idealistic ethical ideology. More than three decades of research reveal fairly consistent findings. Idealism and deontology are generally positively related to ethical decision-making while relativism and teleology are generally negatively related to ethical decision-making.Education, Employment and Experience (3E)Eighty-six studies were published that described education, employment and work of experience. Many studies measured the effect of taking an ethics course on overall ethical judgment, awareness, or intention using undergraduate or MBA students. Awasthi1 found that students who took an ethics course were more inclined to judge a decision as managerially bad when compared to others. …

The Impact of Collectivism and Individualism on Business Ethical Decision Process

Chinese Managers' Cognition of Corporate Social Responsibility: an Empirical Investigation

The Impact of Vertical/Horizontal Individualism and Collectivism on Ethical Consumption

The Process and Antecedents of Team Ethical Decision-Making:A Study in Chinese Context

Collaboration between East and West: influence of consumer dialectical self on attitude towards co-brand personality traits

How Consumer Ethnocentrism (CET), Ethnocentric Marketing, and Consumer Individualism Affect Ethnocentric Behavior in China

The Role of Individualism-Collectivism in the Individual Creative Process

A cross-cultural investigation of work values among young executives in China and the USA

Impact of Cultural Dimensions to Individualism, and Collectivism Dimension

A Study on Key Factors that Influence Employees' Ethical Decision-Making Process

Individualism and collectivism in advertising – An overview

Chinese and American Thinking Patterns from Perspective of Collectivism and Individualism

Cross-national differences in cooperative decision-making in mixed-motive business contexts: the mediating effect of vertical and horizontal individualism

Social Media and Ebusiness: Cultural Impacts on the Influence Process in Consumer Communities

How Does Collectivism Affect Social Interactions? A Test of Two Competing Accounts

The Individual Differences of Ethical Decision Makers

Dimensions of Culture (Geert H. Hofstede) – Individualism and Collectivism

Unveiling Unexpected Selfless Collectivism: Exploring Variances in Moral Beliefs Across Cultural Values

How normative appeals influence pro-environmental behavior: The role of individualism and collectivism

Cultural Influence on Brand Personality Preferences: Individualists Prefer Sophisticated and Competent Brands while Collectivists Prefer Sincere Brands

Crucial to Me and my society: How collectivist culture influences individual pro-environmental behavior through environmental values