Evaluation of the prognostic factors of tumor staging for nasopharyngeal carcinoma
ZONG Jing-feng,MA Jun,TANG Ling-long,LIU li-zhi,Sun Y,HUANG Ying,LIN Ai-hua,LU Tai-xiang,宗井凤,马骏,唐玲珑,刘立志,孙颖,黄莹,林爱华,卢泰祥
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1673-422X.2006.01.023
2006-01-01
Abstract:Objective With the development of imaging, radiation techniques, and the strategy of combined therapy, a large series of nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) patients was conducted to analyze the prognostic significance based on the factors of staging. Methods 749 patients with untreated nondisseminated NPC who had enhanced computed tomography (CT) of the nasopharynx and the whole neck were retrospectively studied. According to the Chinese 1992 staging system, by using the disease specific deaths, local recurrence and distant metastasis as endpoints, gender, age, and detail characters of T/N classification were included in the univariate and multivariate analysis. Results The percentages of patients with Stage Ⅰ-Ⅳ disease were 4. 0% ,29. 8% ,33. 6% and 32. 6% ,respectively. Disease specific survival curves among different stage groups were well segregated. Univariate analysis showed that all factors of T/N classification were of statistical significance. Multivariate analysis showed that independently significant prognostic factors for disease specific death were patient age, gender, oropharynx extention, paranasal sinus involvement, parapharyngeal infiltration, cranial nerve involvement, intracranial involvement , the lymph node level and laterality. Independently significant prognostic factors for local recurrence were paranasal sinus involvement, skull base erosion, parapharyngeal infiltration and intracranial involvement. Prognostic factors that independently impact distant metastasis were parapharyngeal infiltration, intracranial involvement, the lymph node level and laterality. Conclusion Patients with different survival states could be well divided by the Chinese 1992 staging system. Patient distribution was rational. Clinical researches could be conducted based on the results of the prognostic analysis of factors for staging. Patients with intracranial nerve involvement could be classified as the same T classification for simpler and easier application. The information of lymph node laterality should be considered to be involved in the N classification in the future revision.