Abstract:A widely accepted theory is challenged in this paper. Foreign firms’ pricing premium from listing in the US was considered as a result of better regulation and protection of minority shareholders of the listed companies. This paper raises another viewpoint that the regulation clauses may not have been implemented as well as people used to think. The information asymmetry between the US regulators and the overseas firms creates the possibility that illegal activities such as forging documents and faking financial reports may not be discovered in time, especially when listing is through a non-IPO way like reverse merger transactions. As a result, the de facto poorly performed foreign companies also have a chance to list in the US exchanges by exaggerating their business performance in balance sheets and profit from selling stocks to American investors in the secondary market as long as their improper behaviors are not perceived by the regulators before listing. Therefore in contrast to what the existing literature has assumed, there are two types of foreign firms traded on the NYSE, Nasdaq and Amex: good firms with growth opportunities and bad firms which cheat the investors. As investors realize the existence of the bad firms, the problem becomes similar to the market of lemons. Price of the foreign stocks from countries with more information asymmetry, poorer legal enforcement and corporate governance could go down and the cross-listing premium may disappear. This paper uses firm-level accounting data of the Chinese stocks listed in the US exchanges and listed in the four stock markets in mainland China to prove the above hypothesis. Cross-listing discount, instead of premium, is found. Tobin’s q premium from listing in the US has been decreasing from year 2006 when the Chinese firms’ accounting fraud was first reported and finally turned to be negative. The widely reported financial fraud of the US-listed Chinese firms after 2010 proves the correctness of the aforementioned two-type-firm theory. Accordingly, the US-listed Chinese firms with more information disclosure are higher valuated, including firms listed via IPO rather than reverse merger, firms from large Chinese cities with better legal enforcement and easier verification of information authenticity, and large firms which are covered by more analysts and media. As for the hypothesis that bad companies prefer exaggerating their performance in financial reports, the historical data does show that the already delisted companies reported a much higher 12-month trailing EPS before their delisting. Moreover, when there is less information asymmetry and more information disclosure, price of the US-listed Chinese stocks goes up.

Should Earnings Thresholds Be Used As Delisting Criteria in Stock Market?

Short Selling and Financial Reporting Quality: Evidence from Chinese AH Shares

Consequences of earnings management triggered by delisting regulation: Evidence in China

An Analysis on the Earning Management of Public Companies with Accounting Estimate Changes

Earnings Management and the Accrual Anomaly: Evidence from China

(Un)intended Consequences of a Mandatory Dividend Payout Regulation for Earnings Management: Evidence From a Natural Experiment:

Earnings Management and Delisting Risk of Initial Public Offerings

Earnings management at rights issues thresholds—Evidence from China☆

The Extent of Earnings Management to Avoid Loss:Comparisons between Listed and Non-Listed Firms

Are Foreign Companies Listed in the US Really Worth More? Information Asymmetry and Cross-listing Discount of China Concepts Stocks

Are the Regulations on Seasoned Equity Offerings Effective?

Earnings Management and Capital Resource Allocation: Evidence from China's Accounting-Based Regulation of Rights Issues

Delisting regulation and corporate financialization: Evidence from China

US-Listed Chinese Firms in Credibility Crisis: Who Are They? Where Are They?

Regulatory Incentives for Earnings Management Through Asset Impairment Reversals in China

Buy, Lie, or Die: an Investigation of Chinese ST Firms’ Voluntary Interim Audit Motive and Auditor Independence

Delamination of information disclosure and stock price synchronicity — Evidence from China's NEEQ market

Defending the shell: differential effects of delisting pressure on R&D intensity and bribery expenditure

The effects of NASDAQ delisting on firm performance

Information Content of Stock Prices and Earnings Management:Evidence from the Chinese Stock Markets

The Frequency and Magnitude of Earnings Management in China