Abstract:Genetic engineering is one of the most advanced technologies in the world and can bring vast profits to developers by patenting resultant achievements. But genetic engineering must be based on original genetic materials. For obtaining such materials, developers travel around the world, especially to genetically rich areas in developing countries, to prospect for valuable genetic resources and bring back for research and patent derivate products. However a lot of disputes have arisen from such patents, such as the Enola patent dispute on Mexican traditional crop mayocoba bean and the patent dispute on sacred plant Ayahuasca between people and one U.S. Company. Indigenous people, who live in the origin areas of genetic resources for a long history, have established traditional and cultural genuine relation with some living species. These disputes revealed that some genetic engineering exploitation and patents based on certain species may be severely offensive against indigenous peoples spiritual, religious, or cultural traditions. Although genetic engineering achievements patentability has been argued for a long time, the TRIPs Agreement requirement and the worlds legislation trend, either in developed countries such as the U.S., European Union or in developing countries such as China, have indicated that genetic engineering products and processes are legitimately patentable. But some loophole exists in the patent acquisition procedure of current legislation, which allows such offensive patents to be granted. To prevent such offensive patents, one prior consents solution is proposed in this article, which requires genetic engineering developers to obtain prior consents from origin countries of genetic resources before they exploit these resources and patent derivate achievements. This solution is based on the Convention on Biological Diversity, which affirmed countrys sovereignty over their genetic resources and allowed countries to regulate and manage genetic resources in their territory. The Convention on Biological Diversity does not conflict with IPR legislation, in particular the TRIPs Agreement and the obligations under both treaties should be respected. The implementation of this proposed solution is based on the establishment of national genetic resources authority, which generally manages its countrys genetic resources and works as indigenous peoples representative with the authorization of state government. This solution should be implemented in three levels: domestically, transnationally and globally. Therefore, offensive genetic engineering patents could be prevented both by such authoritys examination and granting prior consents before developers access to genetic resources and by national patent administrations examination on prior consents proof from origin countrys authority before granting patents.

Preliminary Study on the Legal Issues Associated with Bio-piracy

Legal Protection of China's Biotechnology Patents

Research on Bio-piracy and Countermeasures of China

Global Bio-Piracy Cases and China's Countermeasures

Legal Discussions on Biodiversity under the Diverse Dimensions

Studies on Intellectual Property Protection in Bioinformatics Database

Biopiracy: Abolish Corporate Hijacking of Indigenous Medicinal Entities

Studies on Legal Issues on Biosecurity

Countermeasure Analysts on Conflicts Between the Protection of Genetic Resources Diversity and Intellectual Property on Biological Technique

A Study on the Legal Regulation of Antarctic Bioprospecting under the System of International Law

The Traditional Knowledge Bill, 2016: Biopiracy and Protection of Cultural Rights

Biopiracy of Plant Resources and Sustainable Traditional Knowledge System in Africa

Prior Consents: Preventing Offensive Genetic Engineering Patents Against Indigenous People's Rights

POLITICS OF BIOPIRACY: AN ADVENTURE INTO HOODIA/XHOBA PATENTING IN SOUTHERN AFRICA

Constructing the Development Ideas of Yunnan Agricultural Economy by the Concept of Biological Intellectual Property Rights

Research on Intellectual Property Right Protection of Genetic Resources in China Under Benefit-Sharing

Review on: Public Perception of Biotechnology on Genetically Modified Crops, Bio Policy and Intellectual Property Rights

Ethnobotany and intellectual property rights

Studying on the Intellectual Property Protection of Database in Bioinformation Technology

Biopiracy in India: Seed diversity and the scramble for knowledge

A New Exploration of Knowledge Intellectual Property Protection of Intangible Cultural Heritage