Contemporary Forture of Rural Communities:Four perspectives

Mao Dan

DOI: https://doi.org/10.19934/j.cnki.shxyj.2010.01.001

2010-01-01

Abstract:De-sociology and de-social-theory of village studies are ignorant of at least the four following issues. 1) From perspective of critical sociology,villages confront forces of market,which requires the separation of land and labor from community and their incorporation into market. So the core issue of village transformation is whether surrendering to forces of market or retaining village community. (2) From perspective of professional sociology,admitting the assumption that modern society still needs small and local community means acknowledging factors such as infrastructure for agricultural economy of village community might be loosened and deprived,but as a community,it remains essential resources of normal modern society. Whether it could adopt appropriate "sea channel strategy" to attain ties with society,depends on which kind of society is seen as normal by state and society. (3) From perspective of public sociology,whether local community is seen as enemy of civil society relies primarily on whether civil society is considered on basis of methodological individualism or communitarianism. From the latter position,appropriate village community is never the enemy of civil society. (4) From perspective of sociology of public policy,when state let rural labor migrate to cities,it might develop rural community vigorously,and develop rural-urban linkage on the premise of resolving economic and social inequality between rural and urban community to avoid breakdown of strategies between acceleration of urbanization and construction of new rural community.