Moral Education and Moral Norms: Reflection on the Moral Theories of Kant and Durkheim

康永久
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1673-1298.2009.06.001
2009-01-01
Abstract:Kant and Durkheim take moral norms as categorical imperatives outside of personal life itself,which confronts enormous difficulty both in theory and practice despite its background in philosophy and sociology.Theoretically speaking,this moral theory has denied the social construction of moral norms,isolated morality from values like life,happiness and rights,denied the value of men and contexts in moral practice,and taken the process of moral practice as a rational or coercive process by principles.In practice,it has caused a series of aftermaths such as unilaterally strengthening the role of teacher and school,neglecting the needs,rights and intentions of children themselves,imposing moral sermons and punishment in immoral manners,and even making morals spiritual chains of others,and thus bringing on furious moral conflicts and social shocks.Actually,moral norms are always context-dependent,rather than context-independent.We must hold goodwill in moral education,and can never give up the autonomy before moral norms.Therefore,it is wrong to be moral for the sake of moral.Men may be not the measure of everything on earth,but at least it is the measure of moral norms and moral education in some sense.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?