Abstract:Introduction. The problem of incomplete coincidence of views of K. Marx and F. Engels has long been raised in marxology. On this topic, D. McLellan, M. Ryubel, K.N. Lubutin and P.N. Kondrashov spoke. However, they were limited to political economy and ontology. We will discuss the views of classics on the origin of private property and the state. Methodology and sources. In this article the textual analysis of the works «Origin of family, private property and state» by F. Engels and «Forms preceding capitalist production» and «Manuscripts of 1844» by K. Marx is taken. The author a dopts a historical-comparative approach, combining the ideas of the classics with those of later Marxist schools. Results and discussion. F. Engels explains the appearance of the state by class contradictions. However, it does not distinguish the concept of «class» from the concept of «estate» and ignores the fact that in the pre-capitalist era an individual opposed another individual as a representative of a community that provided a certain standard of living. In a paragraph entitled «Forms Preceding Capitalist Production» in the «Economic Manuscripts of 1857–1861», K. Marx describes how the state emerged as an organizer of forced community works. This coercion was determined not by socio-political factors but by natural factors. Labor created not only a social product, but also the very relationship of domination. We show the semantic connection of this concept with that which was embodied K. Marx in «Economical-philosophical manuscripts of 1844». Conclusion. In classical Marxism there is no unified concept of the origin of the state and private property; the concepts of K. Marx and F. Engels differ from each other in the interpretation of the role of labor in this process. F. Engels attributes a passive role to labor. For K. Marx, the role of labor is active: labor itself creates its opposite, private property, and with it the state, which arises and exists due to the limitations of labor.

How to Understand the Reestablishing Individual Ownership of Marx and Engels

Enlightenment Reason and Modernity: Marx’s Critical Reconstruction

The Ideality and Reality of Marx's Theory of Human Liberalization

On The Issue of Reconstructing Individual Ownership And Shareholding System

Re-understanding Marx:Marx's Philosophy in Yu Wu-jin's Perspective

F. Engels and K. Marx on the Origin of Private Property and the State: One Concept or Two?

The Human Development Theory Deducted from the Logic of Marxist Theory of Ownership

From Principle to Context: Marx versus Nozick and Rawls on Distributive Justice

The Innovation and Development of Sinified Marxist Ownership Theory

An Analysis of The Three Themes in The Origins of Family, Private Ownership and Country

A Study of Marx’s Property Rights Socialization Thought and Its Enlightenment

Marx' and Engels' Critique of Capitalism: A Historical Review

The Change of the View of Private Property: The Theoretical Opportunity of Marx's Transcendence of Philosophical Communism

The Stage and the Continuity of Marx's Thought Based on the Concept of “realistic Individual”

Marx's Property Right Theory: In the Perspective of Modern Western Property Right Economics

On Karl Marx's Early Economic Study from the Perspective of Doctrinal History

MARXIAN WEALTH-CREATION THEORY AND ITS REALISTIC SIGNIFICANCE

On the Principled Level of Marx's Criticism of Capital

Remarks on Marx and Changing the World

Is Marx's Theory of Alienated Labor in Paris Manuscript Circular Reasoning

Exploring Marx’s Labor Theory of Value from the Experience of Common Sense Chinese Full Text