Pathogenicity Differentiation of Valsa Mali Var.pyri Causing Pear Stem Canker in China

张美鑫,翟立峰,周玉霞,陈晓忍,贾娜娜,洪霓,王国平
DOI: https://doi.org/10.13925/j.cnki.gsxb.2013.04.005
2013-01-01
Abstract:【Objective】The pathogenicity differentiation of the pathogens of pear canker in China was carried out in this study.【Method】By holing,the pathogens of pear Valsa canker were inoculated on different pear excised branches,including Pyrus bretschneideri,P.pyrifolia,P.ussuriensis,P.communis and P.sinkiangensis.The pathogenicity differences of the strains from different sources were observed and compared.The tested strains were divided into different types according to their comprehensive pathogenicity and the relationship between the pathogenicity differentiation of the strains and their sources was analyzed.【Result】The results showed that there were significant differences in pathogenicity of the strains of pear Valsa canker from five pear systems of fourteen provinces in China.The severities of symptom reactions of the same strain on five pear cultivars were different as well.According to the strength of comprehensive pathogenicity of 91 tested strains on 5 pear systems,the strains could be divided into three types including 16 strains with strong pathogenicity(17.6%),70 strains with middle pathogenicity(76.9%) and 5 strains with weak pathogenicity(5.5%).There were significant differences in the proportions of the pathogenic types of the strains from different areas and hosts.This difference was related to disease resistance of pear variety.【Conclusion】Chinese pear Valsa canker pathogens from different areas and pear systems existed obvious pathogenicity differentiation and the strength of comprehensive pathogenicity of the strains could be divided into strong,middle and weak types.The strains with middle pathogenicity were the dominant group.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?