Abstract:Three‐level hybrid surgery (HS) consisting of cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA) and anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) has been partly used for the treatment of multi‐level cervical degenerative disc disease (CDDD). According to the different numbers and locations of CDAs and ACDFs, three‐level HS has several constructs. Few studies have concerned the von Mises stress on the prostheses, and no study had explored the von Mises stress on the vertebrae. However, the complications related to the implants and the collapsibility of the surgical vertebral bodies had been reported in multi‐level anterior cervical spine surgery. Thus, it is necessary to explore the biomechanical effects on the prostheses and vertebrae in three‐level HS. As a result, we found the stress on CDA prostheses in CDA‐ACDF‐CDA construct and the stress on ACDF prostheses in CDA‐ACDF‐CDA and ACDF‐CDA‐ACDF constructs were significantly increased. But the stress on vertebrae were lower compared with that in three‐level ACDF. Purpose Three‐level hybrid surgery (HS) consisting of cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA) and anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) has been partly used for the treatment of multi‐level cervical degenerative disc disease (CDDD). The complications related to the implants and the collapse of the surgical vertebral bodies had been reported in multi‐level anterior cervical spine surgery. Thus, this study aimed to explore the biomechanical effects on the prostheses and vertebrae in three‐level HS. Methods A FE model of cervical spine (C0‐T1) was constructed. Five surgical models were developed. They were FAF model (ACDF‐CDA‐ACDF), AFA model (CDA‐ACDF‐CDA), FFF model (three‐level ACDF), SF model (single‐level ACDF), and SA model (single‐level CDA). A 75‐N follower load and 1.0‐N·m moment was applied to produce flexion, extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation. Results Compared with the intact model, the range of motion (ROM) of total cervical spine in FAF model decreased by 34.54%, 54.48%, 31.76%, and 27.14%, respectively, in flexion, extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation, which were lower than those in FFF model and higher than those in AFA model. The ROMs of CDA segments in FAF and AFA models were similar to the intact model and SA model. Compared with the intact model, the ROMs at C3/4 segment in FFF model increased from 5.71% to 7.85%, and increased from 5.31% to 6.81% at C7/T1 segment, following by FAF model, then the FAF model. The maximum interface pressures of the Prestige‐LP in FAF model were similar to SA model, however the corresponding values were increased in AFA model. The maximum interface pressures of the Zero‐P were increased in FAF and AFA model compared with those in SF and FFF models. The stress was mainly distributed on the screws. In AFA model, the maximum pressures of the ball and trough articulation in superior and inferior Prestige‐LP were all increased compared with those in SA and FAF model. In FFF model, the maximum pressures of the vertebrae were higher than those in other models. The stress was mainly distributed on the anterior area of the vertebral bodies. Conclusions HS seemed to be more suitable than ACDF for the surgical treatment of three‐level CDDD in consideration of the biomechanical effects, especially for the two‐level CDA and one‐level ACDF construct. But a more appropriate CDA prosthesis should be explored in the future.

Biomechanical study on the stress effect of adjacent-level intervertebral disk and intervertebral joint after cervical spine fusion and instrumentation

Endplate Concavity Variation of Lumbar Motion Segments a Finite Element Analysis

Biomechanical Evaluation of Intervertebral Fusion Process After Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: A Finite Element Study

Impact of Adjacent Pre-Existing Disc Degeneration Status on Its Biomechanics after Single-Level Anterior Cervical Interbody Fusion.

[Finite Element Analysis of Biomechanics of Cervical Spine after Dynamic Cervical Implant Surgery].

Finite Element Analysis of Effects of Movable Artificial Lumbar Vertebra Implantation on Stress of Adjacent Intervertebral Discs

Biomechanical Analysis of Adjacent Segments after Spinal Fusion Surgery Using a Geometrically Parametric Patient-Specific Finite Element Model

Impact of Anterior Cervical Fusion Surgeries on Adjacent Segments：a Finite Element Analysis

Adjacent-level biomechanics after single-level anterior cervical interbody fusion with anchored zero-profile spacer versus cage-plate construct: a finite element study

Biomechanical Changes of the Adjacent Segments after Anterior Cervical Decompression and Fusion

Effects of cervical total disc replacement versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion on biomechanics of the segments adjacent to the operation level

Influential factors for adjacent segment degeneration following spinal fusion and effect of internal fixation implants

Biomechanical Effects of Anterior Decompression and Fusion With Cervical Two-Segments Different Internal Fixation Systems: A Finite Element Study

Biomechanics of Artificial Disc Replacements Adjacent to a 2-Level Fusion in 4-Level Hybrid Constructs: an in Vitro Investigation

Changes of Adjacent Segment Biomechanics after Anterior Cervical Interbody Fusion with Different Profile Design Plate: Single- Versus Double-Level

Biomechanical properties of a novel cervical spine implant with elastic deformation: a cadaveric study

[The effect of disc degeneration on the structural property distributions in the cervical vertebral endplates]

Biomechanical Effects on the Prostheses and Vertebrae of Three‐Level Hybrid Surgery: A Finite Element Study

Comparison of the Effect of Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion with Pedicle Screw Fixation and Interspinous Fixation on the Stiffness of Adjacent Segments

A BIOMECHANICAL STUDY OF THE EFFECTS OF FLEXION ANGLE ON THE INDUCTION MECHANISM OF CERVICAL SPONDYLOSIS

Biomechanical Changes of Degenerated Adjacent Segment and Intact Lumbar Spine after Lumbosacral Topping-off Surgery: A Three-dimensional Finite Element Analysis