Clear Cell Myoepithelial Carcinoma and Clear Cell Carcinoma of the Salivary Gland: A Clinicopathological Comparison

杨邵东,曾鸣,陈新明,张佳莉
DOI: https://doi.org/10.13701/j.cnki.kqyxyj.2011.02.013
2011-01-01
Abstract:Objective:To investigate the histopathological and immunohistochemical profiles of clear cell myoepithelial carcinoma,and compare them with those of CCC of salivary glands in an attempt to elucidate the correct diagnosis of these two tumors.Methods:Three CCMCs and five CCCs were reviewed from files of the Department of Oral Pathology,School of Stomatology,Wuhan University.Immunohistochemistry was performed on paraffin-embedded tissue with antibodies to CKAE1/AE3,S100,vimentin,smooth muscle actin,calponin,p63 and maspin.Results:Both types of tumors were composed of exclusively of clear cells,with a few spindle-shaped cells in CCMCs and cells with eosinophilic cytoplasm in CCCs.Immunohistochemically,all three CCMCs were positive for CKAE1/AE3,S100,vimentin,p63 and maspin,and two expressed smooth muscle actin and calponin.All five CCCs were positive for CKAE1/AE3,p63 and maspin,but negative for S100,vimentin,smooth muscle actin and calponin.Conclusion:Both CCMC and CCC of salivary glands are rare,and can be distinguished based on histopathological and immunohistochemical features.Because with neoplastic transformation the modified myoepithelial cells may show variable degrees of smooth muscle differentiation.The combination of CK,S100,vimentin and smooth muscle actin /calponin should be used to confirm the myoepithelial differentiation in CCMC and distinguish CCMC from CCC in conjunction with morphologic features.The results of this study also suggest that the immunostaining of CCMC and CCC with p63 and maspin can not offer an adjunctive aid in differential diagnosis between these two tumors.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?