Subdominant Pairing Channels in Unconventional Superconductors: Ginzburg-Landau Theory

ZD Wang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevb.60.15364
1999-01-01
Abstract:A Ginzburg-Landau theory is developed for unconventional superconductors with the three relevant singlet pairing channels (i.e., s, d(x2-y2) and d(xy) channels). Various consequences of the subdominant channels (i.e., s and d(xy) channels) are examined in detail. (1) In the case of a d(x2-y2) + is-wave superconductor, we reproduce an earlier result that there is a second-order zero-field transition from the pure d(x2-y2) phase to the time-reversal-symmetry- (T-) breaking d(x2-y2) + is-phase at the temperature T-DS. The structure of a single vortex above and below T-DS is fourfold and twofold symmetric, respectively. (2) In the case of a d(x2-y2) + id(xy)-wave superconductor, there is also a second-order zero-field phase transition from the pure d(x2-y2) phase to the T-breaking d(x2-y2) + id(xy)-wave phase at the temperature T-DD'. In contrast to the case in a d(x2-y2) + is-wave superconductor, the subdominant phase cannot be induced by vortices above T-DD'. Below the T-breaking transition, the subdominant phase in the mixed state is nontrivial: it survives at low fields, but may disappear above a field (increasing with decreasing temperature) presumably via a first-order transition. (3) By including the strong-coupling effects, a T-breaking-coupling term between the d(x2-y2) and d(xy) waves is found to have significant effects on the low-temperature behavior of d(x2-y2) + id(xy) superconductors. In a magnetic field, a d(x2-y2) + id(xy) state is always established, but the field dependence of d(xy) amplitude above T-DD' is different from that below T-DD'. Above but not very close to T-DD', the induced minimum Delta(0)proportional to B/(T-T-DD'). [S0163-1829(99)01446-0].
What problem does this paper attempt to address?