Abstract:This article conducts a close examination of China’s exclusionary rules, and presents a detailed discussion of its possible meanings as well as its advantages and shortcomings in the context of comparative law. Part I presents a general survey of China’s exclusionary rules, including the history of the relevant legislation, and ideas that furthered the legislation. Part II explores the relationship between the two provisions concerning excluding illegally obtained evidence and evaluating and examining evidence promulgated in 2010. Part III gives a detailed survey of the scope of China’s exclusionary rules, and introduces different interpretations of China’s criminal procedure rules. Part IV introduces rules concerning procedural issues of the exclusionary rules, and the burden of proof in relation to the legality of the obtainment of evidence. Part V summarizes the characteristics of China’s exclusionary rules in the context of a comparative analysis. The article argues that China’s exclusionary rules are mainly based on the concern of convicting innocent people, and this innocent people protection impetus makes the rules naturally weak in protecting all citizens in criminal procedure. Secondly, China’s exclusionary rules are based on the classification of evidence, and this classification results in many inconveniences, particularly when contrasted to the American rule that is based on the classification of rights. Thirdly, a discretionary exclusionary rule for physical and documentary evidence is not suitable for China. Fourthly, the absence of a poisonous tree doctrine may undermine China’s exclusionary rules in practice. Last but not least, China’s exclusionary rules may be classified as “judge-shared” exclusionary rules, contrasted to the American model of “judge-controlled” exclusionary rules.

The Relevancy Principle in the Federal Rules of Evidence

An Analysis of the Anglo-American Rule of Character Evidence and Its Principles

The Concept of Evidence: Its History of Evolution and Its Epistemological Reconstruction

The Rules of Evidence in Procedural Adjudication

Theoretical anlysis on Exclusionary Rules of Illegal Evidence Chen Ruihua

The Expert Testimony System in Anglo-American Evidence Law

Gauging Court Adjudication: Qualification And Quantification

Exclusionary Rules in China

New Doctrine of Legal Evidence

Understanding Relevance Judgments in Legal Case Retrieval

The role of relevance in explanation I: Irrelevance as statistical independence

On Rules of Defendant's Confession

Importance of judicial decisions as a perceived level of relevance

Chinese Mode of Illegal Evidences' Exclusion

On the Legality Requirements of Evidence in Civil Action

What Kind of Rules for the Exclusion of Illegal Evidence Does China Need?

Resolving the Cohenian Paradox in Judicial Probability Theory

Discussion on Research Methodology of Law of Evidence.

Reflections on the Relevance Logic

Property Research and Approach Modification of Evidential Reasoning Rule

Is the Science of Evidence Law a Science of Law --Review centered with research subjects