Abstract:The current system of liability for medical damage, which has developed along with the on-going of the reform and opening-up of China, has undergone three phases, including the phase of limiting the patients' claim for damages, the phase of increasing the burden of proof of the medical institutions which leads to the defense medical treatments, and the phase of re-thinking and reflection. The current system consists of three double-track systems in the cause of action, the compensation standard for medical damage and the identification of liability, and has a dual structure by differentiating the liability for medical accidents from the liability for medical faults. Such structure reflects the reality of the chaos in the application of law. The draft of the tort liability law provides an opportunity for reforming such system. The basic direction of reform is to insist on the equality of personality and unify the system of liability for medical damage. The basic requirement of reform is to balance the interests of the victims, the medical institutions and all the patients, and the fault liability principle is the best balancer to adjust them. The principle of equality in litigation weapon should be insisted on to balance the opportunities and interests of litigants. Based on these principles, a single-track and unified system of liability for medical damage will be constructed. To realize this construction, firstly, the concept of liability for medical damage should be unified by abandoning the concepts of liability for medical accident and liability for medical fault. Secondly, the liability for medical damage should be divided into three categories, that is, the liability for medical technical damage, the liability for medical ethical damage and the liability for medical product damage, and different imputation principles should be applied in different categories. Thirdly, the general standard of medical fault is the current medical level. Fourthly, the burden of proof in the medical disputes should be scientifically allocated and the compensation standard for personal injury should be unified and limited. Lastly, the nature of liability identification for medical damage should be judicial identification.

Product Liability System in China:Achievements Maintenance and Innovation

Types of Patent Defects and Legal Liabilities——Based on China Contract Law

Fundamental Construction and Major Development of China’s Tort Liability Law

A STUDY ON PUNITIVE DAMAGES IN CHINA

Background and Key Contents of the New Chinese Tort Liability Law

A Study on Damages of Product Injuring Itself

Certain Issues in Enacting Tort Law

The Reform of Liability for Damages Caused by Medical Treatment in the Tort Liability Law: Its Success and Shortages

On the Construction of China's Tort Liability Legal System

The Domestic Characteristics of the Tort Liability Law

From the judicial interpretation to the draft of the Tort Liability Act:The establishment and improvement of the system of compensation for moral damage

Probing the Application of Contributory Negligence in Strict Liability:Analysis and Review of Relevant Articles of Tort Liability Law

Legislative Perfection of the Applicable System of Law concerning the Liability of Foreign Products in Our Country

The System Innovation and Legislative Perfection of Reasons on Relieving or Exempting from Tort Liability

Special Exoneration Defense in US Product Liability Law and What China Can Learn From It

A Study on the Degree of Codification of Tort Law

Probe into the System of Natural Person's Capacity of Civil Liability

Fifty Newest Questions Discussed in the Legislation of Tort Liability Law

Reform of China's System of Liability for Medical Damage

On the Determination of Substantial Tort Law and Its Legislative Forecast

The development, shortcomings and future improvement of punitive damages for environmental torts in China—a reflection and comparative research