Evaluation of Six Different Immunoassays for Serum Thyrotropin

马冬红,陆汉魁,高云朝,葛雯莉,熊江,刘俏平,顾青
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1006-1703.2010.02.013
2010-01-01
Abstract:To analyzes the discrepancy and association among six different thyrotropin(TSH) immunoassay methods and to study their impact on the clinical diagnoses of thyroid diseases,the 150 serum samples from three groups consisting of hyperthyroidism,hypothyroidism and healthy subjects,50 samples in each group were included in this study.The serum TSH levels were measured simultaneously by radioimmunoassay(RIA),immunoradiometric assay(IRMA),three-type chemilumiminescence immunoassay(CLIA) and electrochemiluminescence immunoassay(ECLIA).The results showed that individual serum TSH level varied significantly from one assay to another.There was no correlation between TSH RIA and other five assays in groups of hyperthyroidism and healthy subjects(P0.05).The correlations between TSH IRMA and four automatic assays in hyperthyroidism group were relatively low(r= 0.38~0.41).However,among the four automatic assays,TSH levels were well correlated(r= 0.92~0.99).For clinical diagnoses,TSH RIA alone was not useful in the differentiation of hyperthyroidism and normal subjects,and TSH IRMA was misleading in some hyperthyroidism.There were no significant differences for four TSH automatic immunoassays in differential diagnoses of thyroid diseases.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?