Abstract:The article analyzes the socio-cultural and theoretical origins of the Russian philosophy of history. These origins determined the development of the philosophy of history as a special feld of philosophical knowledge. This process took place in the second half of the 19th century, a significant factor of which was the split within the cultural and spiritual unity of Russian society on the wave of Alexander II’s reforms associated with the abolition of serfdom. In this period the subject-matter of the philosophy of history was defned. In the author’s opinion, the subject-matter of the philosophy of history includes: 1) the historical process in its universal human dimensions and in “past – present – future” movement, 2) the life of society in historically concrete forms of the organization of human community, 3) historical epistemology. The article shows why the philosophy of history, formed in this research feld, was established in the public consciousness and intellectual context as historiosophy , i.e. knowledge of spiritual senses, the beginning and end of history. This philosophical-historical paradigm excluded the oppositions, on the one hand, between philosophical knowledge and historical science and, on the other hand, between the philosophy of the history and social philosophy. As the main ideas of the Russian philosophy of history during that period, the author considers the idea of the integrity of historical existence as an “organic life” (Granovsky) and the idea of the variability of the historical process, interpreted as the constant inclination of history to “permanent improvisation” (Herzen). The author pays special attention to the development of the concepts of “transitional form” and “chaos,” which provide the acceleration of the progressive movement of history and the possibility of an active and responsible participation of an individual and masses in it. The attention to this problem introduced the spiritual and moral component into the ontological basis of the historical process as well as the concept of necessity and chance, freedom and violence, revolution and evolution into the conceptual apparatus of philosophical and historical knowledge. As a result, simultaneously with the metaphysical principles, the principles of concrete historical and axiological analysis were integrated into the methodology of the philosophy of history. This approach to the analysis of the historical process has preserved its heuristic potential to the present day.

Approaching History in the Literature of the Soviet Union

Thinking on Methodology in Culture History of Literature in Tang Dynasty

Historical Writing in Russian Postmodernist Fiction

From History of Literature and History of Books up to Cultural History of Literature

Experimental History: the Appeal of Postmodernism in Historiography

Soviet Sinology and Two Approaches to an Understanding of Chinese History

A Study of Left-Wing Literature in the 1930s:Past,Present and Future

Is a New Chinese Literary History Possible? A Critical Investigation of The Cambridge History of Chinese Literature

Essays about Research on Compiling and Writing the History of Chinese Literature

Historiography and Life Writing in Solzhenitsyn's Late Fiction

A Preliminary Discussion on the Literary History Description in the View of Literary Language Development——Focus on the Literary History of the Medieval Ages

Reinventing Modern China: Imagination and Authenticity in Chinese Historical Writing

The theory of Chinese narrative prose in the early twentieth century.

A Few Problems in the Compilation of Chinese Literary History

Historiosophical Sources and Meanings of the Russian Philosophy of History

On Variations of Classical Chinese Literary Theory for a Framework of Global Literary History

Evolution of the geographical image of the USSR in the presentation of Chinese writers (on example of Hu Shi and Chen Duxiu)

On the Evolution of Wang Yuanhua's Methodology for Literary Theory

HISTORY THROUGH THE MODERNIST LENS

“In the Unity and Diversity of Artistic Traditions” (Book Review: Sozina, E.K. (Ed.) (2020) Istoriya Literatury Urala. XIX Vek: V 2 Kn. [A History of Ural Literature. 19th Century: In 2 Books]. Moscow: LRC)

“To Make a History From This Kind of Material is Not Easy”: The Narrative Construction of Cultural History in Contemporary Fiction