Daily emotional states and emotional self-regulation strategies among high school students with different resilience levels

Ju-Zhe XI,Zhi-Hong ZUO,WU Wei

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1000-6729.2013.09.014

2013-01-01

Abstract:Objective:To explore the differences in daily emotional states and self-regulation strategies among high school students w ith high,intermediate,and low resilience. Methods: Totally 202 high school students w ere selected and divided into the high,intermediate,and low resilience groups( n = 87,61,54,respectively) according to the scores of the Resilience Scale for Chinese Adolescents( RSCA). There daily emotional state and emotional selfregulation strategies w ere measured w ith the Positive Affect and Negative Affect Schedule( PANAS) and Emotion Regulation Questionnaire( ERQ) respectively. Analysis of covariance w ith covariate of gender w as conducted to test group differences in daily emotional states and self-regulation strategies for positive and negative emotions. Results: The students w ith high resilience reported higher PANAS positive affect scores than those w ith intermediate and low resilience [( 33. 3 ± 6. 2) vs.( 30. 8 ± 5. 2),( 29. 4 ± 6. 9); P < 0. 001]. In contrast,students w ith low resilience reported higher PANAS negative affect scores than those w ith high and intermediate resilience [( 27. 5 ± 7. 7) vs.( 22. 3 ± 6. 0),( 24. 0 ± 7. 3); P < 0. 001]. When experiencing positive emotions,the students w ith high resilience had higher ERQ rumination scores than those w ith low resilience [( 3. 4 ± 0. 6) vs.( 3. 0 ± 0. 8),P < 0. 05],and higher ERQ revealing scores [( 3. 2 ± 0. 7) vs.( 3. 0 ± 0. 6),( 2. 8 ± 0. 9); P < 0. 01] and low er ERQ suppression scores[( 1. 4 ± 0. 5) vs.( 1. 6 ± 0. 5),( 1. 8 ± 0. 8); P < 0. 01] than those w ith low and intermediate resilience. When experenerving negative emotions,the students w ith high resilience had low er suppression scores than those w ith low and intermediate resilience [( 2. 2 ± 0. 7) vs.( 2. 5 ± 0. 6),( 2. 6 ± 0. 8); P < 0. 05],w hile the students w ith low resilience had higher rumination scores than those w ith high and intermediate resilience [( 2. 1 ± 0. 7) vs.( 1. 8 ± 0. 5),( 1. 9 ± 0. 5); P < 0. 001]. Conclusions: It suggests that students w ith different levels of resilience may have different daily emotional states and self-regulation strategies. Students w ith high resilience maybe tend to use rumination and revealing more frequently and suppression less frequently to regulate positive emotions. In comparison,they maybe use rumination and suppression less frequently to regulate negative emotions.