Abstract:Background Magnetic resonance image only (MRI‐only) simulation for head and neck (H&N) radiotherapy (RT) could allow for single‐image modality planning with excellent soft tissue contrast. In the MRI‐only simulation workflow, synthetic computed tomography (sCT) is generated from MRI to provide electron density information for dose calculation. Bone/air regions produce little MRI signal which could lead to electron density misclassification in sCT. Establishing the dosimetric impact of this error could inform quality assurance (QA) procedures using MRI‐only RT planning or compensatory methods for accurate dosimetric calculation. Purpose The aim of this study was to investigate if Hounsfield unit (HU) voxel misassignments from sCT images result in dosimetric errors in clinical treatment plans. Methods Fourteen H&N cancer patients undergoing same‐day CT and 3T MRI simulation were retrospectively identified. MRI was deformed to the CT using multimodal deformable image registration. sCTs were generated from T1w DIXON MRIs using a commercially available deep learning‐based generator (MRIplanner, Spectronic Medical AB, Helsingborg, Sweden). Tissue voxel assignment was quantified by creating a CT‐derived HU threshold contour. CT/sCT HU differences for anatomical/target contours and tissue classification regions including air ( 500 HU) were quantified. t‐test was used to determine if sCT/CT HU differences were significant. The frequency of structures that had a HU difference > 80 HU (the CT window‐width setting for intra‐cranial structures) was computed to establish structure classification accuracy. Clinical intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) treatment plans created on CT were retrospectively recalculated on sCT images and compared using the gamma metric. Results The mean ratio of sCT HUs relative to CT for air, adipose tissue, soft tissue, spongy and cortical bone were 1.7 ± 0.3, 1.1 ± 0.1, 1.0 ± 0.1, 0.9 ± 0.1 and 0.8 ± 0.1 (value of 1 indicates perfect agreement). T‐tests (significance set at t = 0.05) identified differences in HU values for air, spongy and cortical bone in sCT images compared to CT. The structures with sCT/CT HU differences > 80 HU of note were the left and right (L/R) cochlea and mandible (>79% of the tested cohort), the oral cavity (for 57% of the tested cohort), the epiglottis (for 43% of the tested cohort) and the L/R TM joints (occurring > 29% of the cohort). In the case of the cochlea and TM joints, these structures contain dense bone/air interfaces. In the case of the oral cavity and mandible, these structures suffer the additional challenge of being positionally altered in CT versus MRI simulation (due to a non‐MR safe immobilizing bite block requiring absence of bite block in MR). Finally, the epiglottis HU assignment suffers from its small size and unstable positionality. Plans recalculated on sCT yielded global/local gamma pass rates of 95.5% ± 2% (3 mm, 3%) and 92.7% ± 2.1% (2 mm, 2%). The largest mean differences in D95, Dmean, D50 dose volume histogram (DVH) metrics for organ‐at‐risk (OAR) and planning tumor volumes (PTVs) were 2.3% ± 3.0% and 0.7% ± 1.9% respectively. Conclusions In this cohort, HU differences of CT and sCT were observed but did not translate into a reduction in gamma pass rates or differences in average PTV/OAR dose metrics greater than 3%. For sites such as the H&N where there are many tissue interfaces we did not observe large scale dose deviations but further studies using larger retrospective cohorts are merited to establish the variation in sCT dosimetric accuracy which could help to inform QA limits on clinical sCT usage.

SU‐FF‐T‐422: Dependency of Proton Dose on Tissue Composition Investigated Using Monte Carlo Models of Hounsfield Number Conversion and Cadaver‐Based Anatomical Data

SU‐GG‐T‐328: Human Anatomy‐Based Monte Carlo Dose Calculation for External Protons

SU-FF-T-157: Different Methods of Organ Equivalent Dose Scoring in Monte Carlo Neutron Dose Calculations

Monte Carlo multiscale modelling of photon and proton distribution in heterogenous tissue

Validation of a Deep Learning-Based Material Estimation Model for Monte Carlo Dose Calculation in Proton Therapy.

Evaluation Of The Dosimetric Impact Of Interfractional Anatomical Variations On Prostate Proton Therapy Using Daily In-Room Ct Images

Monte Carlo CT Dose Calculation: A Comparison Between Experiment and Simulation Using ARCHER-CT

Application of stoichiometric CT number calibration method for dose calculation of tissue heterogeneous volumes in boron neutron capture therapy

Relationship between electron density and effective densities of body tissues for stopping, scattering, and nuclear interaction of proton and ion beams

SU-EE-A4-06: Organ-Specific Adjustment Factors for Calculating Dose from Any CT Scanner

Effects of Tissue Material Properties on X-Ray Image, Scatter and Patient Dose Determined using Monte Carlo Simulations

SU‐FF‐T‐411: Boundary Study of Bragg Peak Shift and Bragg Peak Degradation in Proton Dose Calculation

SU‐GG‐T‐346: Accurate Simulation for Therapeutic Protons Range‐Energy and Range‐Density Tables

Effects of tissue heterogeneity and comparisons of collapsed cone and Monte Carlo fast neutron patient dosimetry using the University of Washington clinical neutron therapy system (CNTS)

CT Number Conversion Method for Monte Carlo Dose Calculations in Radiotherapy

MO‐E‐T‐617‐07: Simulation of Organ Specific Secondary Neutron Dose in Proton Beam Treatments

SU-GG-T-347: Methods to Calculate Organ Doses Due to Scattered Radiation From External Beam Radiation Treatment Using Various Patient Phantoms and Monte Carlo Simulations

Evaluating the Hounsfield unit assignment and dose differences between CT‐based standard and deep learning‐based synthetic CT images for MRI‐only radiation therapy of the head and neck

Construction of Patient-Specific Computational Models for Organ Dose Estimation in Radiological Imaging.

SU‐E‐I‐41: Study On the CT Radiation Attenuation Characteristics of Human Body for Phantom Design Using Monte Carlo Simulations

Dose Conversion Coefficients Based on the Chinese Mathematical Phantom and MCNP Code for External Photon Irradiation