Clinical Study on Event-Related Potentials P300 in Early Cognitive Impairment of Parkinson Disease
DU Ji-chen,YANG Xu,LI Ji-lai,PU Chuan-qiang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1004-583x.2006.09.002
2006-01-01
Abstract:Objective To observe whether the event-related potentials(ERP) P300 latency and amplitude has difference between parkinson disease(PD) patients with various cognitive scale score,or between PD patients and the control subjects.So as to explore a kind of objective and reliable method for the early diagnosis of cognitive impairment in patients with PD.Methods The study personals were divided into the designer,observer and data collector,and examiner.Thirty-two cases of non-demented patients with PD were selected as patients group,25 healthy volunteers were collected as control group,matched by age,sex and education with the patients group.ERPs were recorded from 30 scalp electrodes in the patients and control subjects during the tasks of familiar and unfamiliar names.The experiment instrument is EMS 32 lead of the brain electricity topography system made in Germany.The name,which was familiar to the examiners,was determined by the observer through analyzing the ERP records during the double-blind condition.Results ①Regardless of the evaluation made by the observer and data collector or the examiner,the correct rates of judgment on control subjects were obviously higher than those on PD patients.②The wave amplitudes of N2-P3 evoked by familiar names were higher than those evoked by unfamiliar names in both patients and control groups(P(0.05);P(0.01)).Compared with control subjects,the latencies of N2-P3 were longer,and wave amplitudes were lower in the patients with PD.But there were no statistical difference between both groups(P(0.05)).③Compared with control subjects,the latencies of N2-P3 were significant prolonged in PD patients with MMSE 24-26 scores(familiar: P(0.01),P(0.01);unfamiliar: P(0.01),P(0.01)).The latencies of N2-P3 were also significant longer in PD patients with MMSE 24-26 points scores than those of patients with MMSE 27-30 points scores(familiar: P(0.05),P(0.01);unfamiliar: P(0.05),P(0.01)).The wave amplitudes of N2-P3 showed no significant difference among the patients with MMSE 24-26 points scores,patients with MMSE 27-30 points scores,and control subjects(P(0.05)).Conclusion PD patients have difficulty in distinguishing one thing from another by identifying the different characters of things.The method of distinction person names(familiar or unfamiliar) as ERPs target stimulation can identify the cognitive function impairment in PD patients in an early stage;the P300 latency prolongation occurs before the amplitude declines.So the prolongation of P300 latency is a marker that can sensitively reflect subclinical cognitive impairment.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?