Abstract:Objective To compare the effect of etomidate on proseal laryngeal mask(PLMA) insertion condition with propofol.Methods Twenty-eight patients scheduled for selective surgery were randomly allocated to two groups: etomidate group(n=13) and propofol group(n=15). Midazolam 0.02mg/kg were administrated before induction. After pre-oxygenation, anesthesia was induced with lidocaine 1.5mg/kg, etomidate 0.3mg/kg, fentanyl 50μg (etomidate group), or lidocaine 1.5mg/kg, propofol 2mg/kg, fentanyl 50μg (propofol group). After insertion of PLMA, the times of lash reflex disappearance, jaw relaxation, successful insertion were assessed. Gagging, coughing, limbs movement, number of attempts at insertion were observed. HR, SBP and DBP were recorded before and after induction. Results There were no difference between two groups in the times of lash reflex disappearance, jaw relaxation, successful insertion. Compared with propofol group, the incidence of apnoea was significantly low in etomidate group, but that of limbs movement were relatively high. There were no difference in HR, SBP and DBP in etomidate group before and after induction, however, in propofol group, SBP and DBP were decreased compared with baseline. Conclusion Etomidate (0.3mg/kg) combined with lidocaine and fentanyl is able to provide satisfied condition for PLMA insertion with stable hemodynamics, but the incidence of limbs movement is relatively higher than propofol group.

Comparison of etomidate with propofol in proseal laryngeal mask insertion