[Effect of Lung Protective Ventilation Strategy on Pulmonary Inflammatory Response in a Rabbit Model of Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome].

H Qiu,Y Yang,Y Yan
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/cc3159
IF: 15.1
2005-01-01
Critical Care
Abstract:OBJECTIVE To evaluate the effect of lung protective ventilation strategy on pulmonary inflammatory response in acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). METHODS The ARDS rabbit model was duplicated by saline alveolar-lavage. The rabbits were divided into six groups: (1) normal control group (N group); (2) ARDS group (M group); (3) low-volume with best end-expiratory pressure (PEEP, A group) group: tidal volume (V(T)) 6 ml/kg, PEEP 2 cm H(2)O greater than the pressure of lower inflection point in pressure-volume curve (P(LIP)); (4) normal-volume with best PEEP group (B group): V(T) 6 ml/kg, and PEEP P(LIP) + 2 cm H(2)O; (5) low-volume with high PEEP group (C group): V(T) 6 ml/kg, and PEEP 15 cm H(2)O; and (6) high-volume with zero PEEP group (D group): V(T) 20 ml/kg. Lung wet/dry weight ratios (W/D) were recorded to evaluate lung injury. After 4 h of ventilation, lung homogenates were prepared to detect nuclear factor-kappaB (NF-kappaB) activity by electrophoretic mobility gel shift assay (EMSA), tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha) and interleukin-10 (IL-10) levels by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and their mRNA expression by reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). Myeloperoxidase (MPO) and malondialdehyde (MDA) in lung homogenates were also assessed. RESULTS After 4 h ventilation, W/D in A group (5.6 +/- 1.1) were significantly lower than those in B group, C group and D group (6.6 +/- 0.8, 6.6 +/- 1.0, 6.9 +/- 1.0, all P < 0.05). But there was no difference between A group and M group (5.8 +/- 0.5). NF-kappaB activity was the highest in D group, and that in A group was 331 +/- 113, which was decreased significantly as compared with B, C and D groups (455 +/- 63, 478 +/- 74, 645 +/- 162, all P < 0.05). The mRNA expression of TNF-alpha and IL-10 and their concentrations in lung homogenates in A group were lower than those in B, C and D groups. In A group, the concentrations of MPO and MDA in lung homogenates were significantly lower than those in B, C and D groups. CONCLUSION Lung protective ventilation strategy can inhibit lung inflammation and may improve lung injury in ARDS, but low tidal volume with high PEEP may increase lung inflammation.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?