Endovascular Stent-Graft Placement in Patients with Stanford Type B Aortic Dissection in China: A Systematic Review
Junwei Wang,Yonghui Li,Yongxin Li,Zefang Ren,Peng Chen,Xueke Qian,Shenming Wang,Jinsong Wang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avsg.2016.04.006
IF: 1.5
2016-01-01
Annals of Vascular Surgery
Abstract:Background: Improvements in stent-graft devices and increasing clinical experience with the technique have improved outcomes and expanded clinical indications in patients with Stanford type B aortic dissection (AD) in China. However, the evolution of and modifications to stent grafts have not been reviewed. The aim of this study was to summarize all available published data on technical success, potential benefits, complications, stent evolution, and survival rates associated with endovascular stent-graft placements in patients with Stanford type B AD in China.Methods: We performed comprehensive searches of the Chinese-language medical literature in Chinese Biomedical Database, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, and Wanfang Data and of the English-language medical literature in PubMed, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library. This systematic review was based on all retrospective studies assessing outcomes of Stanford type B AD treated with endovascular stent-graft placement in China.Results: A total of 153 retrospective studies that included 8,694 cases were analyzed in this study. Procedure success was reported in 99.7 +/- 0.1% of patients. Overall complications were reported in 19.1 +/- 0.6% of patients. Postoperative endoleaks occurred in 7.2 +/- 0.3% of patients. Major complications were reported in 3.2 +/- 0.2% of patients, with a neurological complication rate of 1.3 +/- 0.1%. Periprocedural stroke occurred more frequently than did paraplegia (0.8 +/- 0.1% vs. 0.1 +/- 0.04%). Overall complications were significantly greater in patients treated with first-generation stents than in those treated with second-generation stents (25.1 +/- 1.2% vs. 9.5 +/- 0.9%, P < 0.001). The in-hospital mortality rate was 1.6 +/- 0.1%. In addition, 1.8 +/- 0.2% of patients died during a mean follow-up period of 29.4 +/- 13.5 months. The Kaplan-Meier estimates of the overall survival rate were 99.0 +/- 0.1% at 30 days, 98.5 +/- 0.2% at 6 months, 98.4 +/- 0.2% at 1 year, 98.1 +/- 0.2% at 2 years, and 97.9 +/- 0.2% at 5 years.Conclusions: Endovascular stent-graft placement is feasible and has a high technique success rate as well as favorable neurological complication and survival rates when used to treat Stanford type B AD. The new generation of stent grafts appears to have favorable in-hospital and follow-up outcomes.