Deep hypnosis as a sign of "imbalance" in balanced anesthesia.
J. Kurata
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0b013e3181c30fa0
2010-03-01
Abstract:In this issue of Anesthesia & Analgesia, Leslie et al. show a potential role of intraoperative bispectral index (BIS, Aspect Medical Systems, Norwood, MA) monitoring in reducing long-term morbidity and mortality after surgery under general anesthesia. The report was a post hoc analysis of the B-Aware trial that was undertaken to determine whether intraoperative BIS monitoring reduced awareness during surgery. In this original trial, the authors found that BIS-guided titration of an anesthetic reduced intraoperative awareness by as much as 82%. To test the hypothesis that BIS monitoring improved survival, they reanalyzed the same data including the perioperative parameters, together with added follow-up data on the prognosis (death, myocardial infarction, and stroke) from 1947 patients. The authors found that BIS monitoring itself did not affect survival but that in patients with a BIS decrease 40 for 5 min there was an association with decreased survival (a hazard ratio for death of 1.42) and increased rates of myocardial infarction and stroke compared with those patients who did not show such a BIS decrease. The main findings of this study might suggest the use of BIS monitoring in controlling the depth of anesthesia within the appropriate hypnotic range, between 40 and 60, to improve prognosis of surgical patients. As the authors noted, survival and morbidity of surgical patients might be determined by systemic circulatory status and organ perfusion rather than anesthetic depth itself as indicated by the BIS value. Because of the nature of this retrospective analysis, intraoperative circulatory data were not available in sufficient detail to search for a possible correlation between low BIS values and hypotension. For the BIS-monitored cohort of patients, each anesthesiologist tried to titrate anesthesia depth to keep BIS values within the range of 40–60 and recorded an unintended or unavoidable incidence of BIS 40 for 5 min manually on the anesthesia record. Such notations helped the authors identify “oversedation” cases and test the hypothesis that BIS-guided titration might lead to reduced morbidity and mortality after surgery. Before the introduction of BIS and other types of brain function monitors to gauge anesthetic depth, it had been customary to titrate anesthetic agents by targeting an appropriate range of hemodynamic parameters, such as heart rate and systemic blood pressure. In the present era of “balanced anesthesia,” we have disassociated 3 components of anesthesia, i.e., unconsciousness, analgesia, and immobility, which are independently controlled with a hypnotic, an analgesic, and a neuromuscular blocking agent, respectively. An increase in heart rate and blood pressure sometimes signals awareness or insufficient analgesia, especially if combined with neuromuscular blockade. A decrease in heart rate and blood pressure, however, might indicate a relative overdose of a hypnotic or analgesic drug. Such a decrease in hemodynamic parameters beyond physiologically acceptable levels could potentially be associated with hypoperfusion of major vital organs. Changes in these parameters thus signal an “imbalance” in balanced anesthesia and prompt us to titrate each agent to recover normal circulation. What happens when a hypnotic is administered in an amount larger than that needed to just induce unconsciousness? Electrical and metabolic activities of the brain are reduced, with electroencephalographic changes leading to lower BIS values. We actually do not know the exact impact of anestheticinduced hypotension on the function and viability of vital organs including the brain, the heart, the liver, and the kidney. We do know that each organ generally needs sufficient blood flow and perfusion pressure to maintain its normal function and that volatile or IV hypnotics might exert some protective effects in each organ by metabolic suppression and/or preconditioning. The vital organs might be tolerant against moderate hypoperfusion and/or hypoxia during anesthesia. Nevertheless, it is reasonable to assume that maintaining normal circulation and sufficient organ perfusion is the correct management to protect patients against the adverse outcomes of anesthesia. However, low BIS values are often observed during circulatory depression from causes other than anesthetic overdose, e.g., shock from excessive hemorrhage, heart failure, or peripheral vasodilatation, possibly from impaired cerebral neuronal activity secondary to reduced cerebral blood flow. Such critical conditions might well have led to a higher incidence of myocardial infarction or stroke. Indeed, the B-Aware trial involved high-risk patients undergoing From the Department of Anesthesia, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Shogoin, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto, Japan.