Abstract:We introduce a new approach to determine the normal of Earth’s bow shock, based on four‐point magnetic field measurements. The method obtains the local bow shock normal, based on the assumption that the normal is in the opposite direction to the gradient of the magnetic pressure or magnetic strength (within the shock front). This gradient can be deduced from the four‐point magnetic field measurements of Cluster. Applying the method, we calculate the normal of the bow shock for 28 Cluster crossing events from March to April of 2002 and February to March of 2004 and compare the results for the boundary orientation to commonly known methods, i.e., minimum variance analysis and the coplanarity theorem. In addition, we compare results of the normal obtained by four spacecraft timing analysis, under the assumptions of local planarity and constant velocity of the boundary (triangulation). It is known that minimum variance analysis often fails because of the temporal variation of the bow shock and coplanarity analysis often fails because of the existence of an overshoot or poor determination of the downstream magnetic field due to plasma disturbance. We find that the gradient analysis agrees most closely with the timing analysis, and, in general, the shock orientations obtained fit the expected bow shock geometry. The gradient method is valid for quasi‐stable shocks and does not require the conditions of coplanarity or constant velocity of the bow shock to be satisfied. Its accuracy depends on this stability and the relative spatial scale of the shock, which should be large compared to the spacecraft configuration. A feature of the method, however, is that it provides an estimate of the normal point by point in time, allowing the nature of the spacecraft sampling to be monitored in terms of behavior as each shock event is traversed.

Comparison Between Magnetic Coplanarity and MVA Methods in Determining the Normal of Venusian Bow Shock

New Approach for Determining the Normal of the Bow Shock Based on Cluster Four‐point Magnetic Field Measurements

A 3D Parametric Venusian Bow Shock Model with the Effects of Mach Number and Interplanetary Magnetic Field

Asymmetries in the location of the Venus and Mars bow shock

Initial Venus Express Magnetic Field Observations of the Magnetic Barrier at Solar Minimum

Imf Control of the Location of Venusian Bow Shock: the Effect of the Magnitude of Imf Component Tangential to the Bow Shock Surface

On the Venus Bow Shock Compressibility

The Shape of the Venusian Bow Shock at Solar Minimum and Maximum: Revisit Based on VEX Observations

Solar Zenith Angle‐dependent Asymmetries in Venusian Bow Shock Location Revealed by Venus Express

Magnetic Fluctuations and Turbulence in the Venusian Magnetosheath Downstream of Different Types of Bow Shock

Unusually distant bow shock encounters at Venus

Inferring of flux rope orientation with the minimum variance analysis technique

The Solar-Cycle Dependence of the Location and Shape of the Venus Bow Shock

The Dynamic Venusian Bow Shock Model With the Nonlinear Effect of Magnetosonic Mach Number Based on Venus Express Observations

World Line Dependence of Current Sheet Normals Inferred by Minimum Variance Techniques

Magnetosheath fluctuations at Venus for two extreme orientations of the interplanetary magnetic field

Turbulence Near the Venusian Bow Shock: Venus Express Observations

Interplanetary Magnetic Field Control of the Mars Bow Shock: Evidence for Venuslike Interaction

Spatial Scales of the Magnetic Ramp at the Venusian Bow Shock

Neutral sheet normal direction determination

Venusian Bow Shock As Seen by the ASPERA‐4 Ion Instrument on Venus Express