Abstract:In this paper, a sparse learning algorithm, probabilistic classification vector machines (PCVMs), is proposed. We analyze relevance vector machines (RVMs) for classification problems and observe that adopting the same prior for different classes may lead to unstable solutions. In order to tackle this problem, a signed and truncated Gaussian prior is adopted over every weight in PCVMs, where the sign of prior is determined by the class label, i.e., +1 or -1. The truncated Gaussian prior not only restricts the sign of weights but also leads to a sparse estimation of weight vectors, and thus controls the complexity of the model. In PCVMs, the kernel parameters can be optimized simultaneously within the training algorithm. The performance of PCVMs is extensively evaluated on four synthetic data sets and 13 benchmark data sets using three performance metrics, error rate (ERR), area under the curve of receiver operating characteristic (AUC), and root mean squared error (RMSE). We compare PCVMs with soft-margin support vector machines (SVM(Soft)), hard-margin support vector machines (SVM(Hard)), SVM with the kernel parameters optimized by PCVMs (SVM(PCVM)), relevance vector machines (RVMs), and some other baseline classifiers. Through five replications of twofold cross-validation F test, i.e., 5 x 2 cross-validation F test, over single data sets and Friedman test with the corresponding post-hoc test to compare these algorithms over multiple data sets, we notice that PCVMs outperform other algorithms, including SVM(Soft), SVM(Hard), RVM, and SVM(PCVM), on most of the data sets under the three metrics, especially under AUC. Our results also reveal that the performance of SVM(PCVM) is slightly better than SVM(Soft), implying that the parameter optimization algorithm in PCVMs is better than cross validation in terms of performance and computational complexity. In this paper, we also discuss the superiority of PCVMs' formulation using maximum a posteriori (MAP) analysis and margin analysis, which explain the empirical success of PCVMs.

Parallel Proximal Support Vector Machine for High-Dimensional Pattern Classification

Parallelizing Support Vector Machines on Distributed Computers

Inverse Matrix-Free Incremental Proximal Support Vector Machine

Distributed Online Semi-Supervised Support Vector Machine

Incremental Least Squares Classifier Vs.incremental Proximal Support Vector Machine

ν-Nonparallel support vector machine for pattern classification

Probabilistic Classification Vector Machines.

Parallel and Sequential Support Vector Machines for Multi-label Classification

Parallel Computing of Support Vector Machines

Fast Training Support Vector Machines Using Parallel Sequential Minimal Optimization

On the proliferation of support vectors in high dimensions

DCSVM: fast multi-class classification using support vector machines

Approximate Approach to Train SVM on Very Large Data Sets

Fast Parallel SVM using Data Augmentation

Multi-sphere Classification Algorithm Based on 1-SVM

Multi-task proximal support vector machine

Probabilistic Classification Vector Machine for Multi-Class Classification

Multiclass Probabilistic Classification Vector Machine

Parallel Multiclass Support Vector Machine for Remote Sensing Data Classification on Multicore and Many-Core Architectures

Parallel and Distributed Structured SVM Training

Fast multi-view twin hypersphere support vector machine with consensus and complementary principles