HIGH-RESOLUTION MAGNETIC MEASUREMENTS ON A LAKE SEDIMENT CORE FROM DAIHAI LAKE:COMPARISON BETWEEN U-CHANNEL AND DISCRETE SAMPLE METHODS

Zhu Yanming,Yu Yongtao,Zhou Liping,Xue Bin,Wu Yanhong,Qiang Xiaoke
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3321/j.issn:1001-7410.2007.06.013
2007-01-01
Abstract:High-resolution magnetic measurement on lake sediments from arid and semi-arid regions is an important means of characterizing paleoenvironmental changes. Previous research has shown that the Daihai Lake, an inland graben-type basin in Inner Mongolia, China, contains rich information about the evolution of paleomonsoons. Here we present results of high-resolution magnetic measurements of the lake sediments from a 79.16m core(DH06A), drilled at the southeast littoral area of the Daihai Lake(40°32.127′N, 112°37.802′E). We compared the magnetic susceptibility and anhysteretic remanent magnetization(ARM)that are obtained by both U-channel and discrete sample methods. Low-frequency magnetic susceptibility (κlf) from detailed U-channel measurements varies in the range of 1.09×10-5 to 283×10-5 SI, in contrast to 2.23×10-5~319.37×10-5 SI for the conventional measurement on discrete cubic samples. The ARM value measured by U-channel and discrete sample methods ranges from 0 to 33.33×10-3A/m and from 0 to 1070×10-3A/m, respectively. Although the κlf and ARM obtained with these two methods differ in values, the similar trends of variations against depth and the high Spearman coefficients(0.873 and 0.834, respectively)suggest that these two methods are well correlated and comparable in general. For high-resolution long-core magnetic measurements, the U-channel method is a reliable, rapid, and efficient alternative to its discrete sample counterpart. Our comparative study on DH06A core magnetic susceptibility suggests that the mass-specific frequency-dependent susceptibility(fd)is capable of sensitively depicting sub-order high frequency variations. In contrast, the percentage frequency-dependent susceptibility(fd%)primarily falls in the range between 1%~5%. Its trend differs significantly from other magnetic susceptibility parameters, the reason of which remains ambiguous and require further work.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?