Abstract:Background and aims: A model to predict anthesis time of a wheat plant from environmental and genetic information requires integration of current concepts in physiological and molecular biology. This paper describes the structure of an integrated model and quantifies its response mechanisms. Methods: Literature was reviewed to formulate the components of the model. Detailed re-analysis of physiological observations are utilized from a previous publication by the second two authors. In this approach measurements of leaf number and leaf and primordia appearance of near isogenic lines of spring and winter wheat grown for different durations in different temperature and photoperiod conditions are used to quantify mechanisms and parameters to predict time of anthesis. Key results: The model predicts the time of anthesis from the length of sequential phases: 1, embryo development; 2, dormant; 3, imbibed/emerging; 4, vegetative; 5, early reproductive; 6, pseudo-stem extension; and 7, ear development. Phase 4 ends with vernalization saturation (VS), Phase 5 with terminal spikelet (TS) and Phase 6 with flag leaf ligule appearance (FL). The durations of Phases 4 and 5 are linked to the expression of Vrn genes and are calculated in relation to change in Haun stage (HS) to account for the effects of temperature per se. Vrn1 must be expressed to sufficient levels for VS to occur. Vrn1 expression occurs at a base rate of 0·08/HS in winter 'Batten' and 0·17/HS in spring 'Batten' during Phases 1, 3 and 4. Low temperatures promote expression of Vrn1 and accelerate progress toward VS. Our hypothesis is that a repressor, Vrn4, must first be downregulated for this to occur. Rates of Vrn4 downregulation and Vrn1 upregulation have the same exponential response to temperature, but Vrn4 is quickly upregulated again at high temperatures, meaning short exposure to low temperature has no impact on the time of VS. VS occurs when Vrn1 reaches a relative expression of 0·76 and Vrn3 expression begins. However, Vrn2 represses Vrn3 expression so Vrn1 must be further upregulated to repress Vrn2 and enable Vrn3 expression. As a result, the target for Vrn1 to trigger VS was 0·76 in 8-h photoperiods (Pp) and increased at 0·026/HS under 16-h Pp as levels of Vrn2 increased. This provides a mechanism to model short-day vernalization. Vrn3 is expressed in Phase 5 (following VS), and apparent rates of Vrn3 expression increased from 0·15/HS at 8-h Pp to 0·33/HS at 16-h Pp. The final number of leaves is calculated as a function of the HS at which TS occurred (TS(HS)): 2·86 + 1·1 × TS(HS). The duration of Phase 6 is then dependent on the number of leaves left to emerge and how quickly they emerge. Conclusions: The analysis integrates molecular biology and crop physiology concepts into a model framework that links different developmental genes to quantitative predictions of wheat anthesis time in different field situations.

Vernalization and Phyllochron in Winter Wheat

Phyllochron Change in Winter Wheat with Planting Date and Environmental Changes

Temperature And Daylength Interaction On Phyllochron In Wheat And Barley

Plant and Floret Growth at Distinct Developmental Stages During the Stem Elongation Phase in Wheat

Temperature Effect On Leaf Emergence And Phyllochron In Wheat And Barley

Integration of molecular and physiological models to explain time of anthesis in wheat

VERNALIZATION1 controls developmental responses of winter wheat under high ambient temperatures

Daylength Effect On Leaf Emergence And Phyllochron In Wheat And Barley

The need for the vernalization duration of soft winter wheat collection samples

Modelling Phasic Development in Wheat: a Conceptual Integration of Physiological Components

Genetics and Physiology of Vernalization Response in Wheat

Epigenomic identification of vernalization cis-regulatory elements in winter wheat

The central role of the VERNALIZATION1 gene in the vernalization response of cereals

Vernalization treatment induces site-specific DNA hypermethylation at the VERNALIZATION-A1 (VRN-A1) locus in hexaploid winter wheat

Transcriptome analysis during vernalization in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)

Two-phase linear models of leaf emergence at different tillering positions in wheat and effects of different varieties and sowing dates]

A molecular mechanism for embryonic resetting of winter memory and restoration of winter annual growth habit in wheat

Genetic variation for the duration of pre-anthesis development in durum wheat and its interaction with vernalization treatment and photoperiod

Vernalization: Winter and the Timing of Flowering in Plants

Experiencing winter for spring flowering: A molecular epigenetic perspective on vernalization

Winter warming post floral initiation delays flowering via bud dormancy activation and affects yield in a winter annual crop