Error Analysis in Matrix Reasoning Tests

Li Zhongquan,Kong Ming,Zhang Houcan,Zhou Renlai
DOI: https://doi.org/10.16719/j.cnki.1671-6981.2010.03.036
IF: 10.172
2010-01-01
Psychological Science
Abstract:Computerized automatic item generation(AIG) was gradually employed in dealing with item exposure in matrix reasoning tests.However,how to design better distracters was still unclear.Most studies related to matrix reasoning tests(MRT,represented by Raven Matrices) used total number correct or incorrect rates as the variables of interest,but few conducted analysis of the types of errors that individuals made.In the present study,340 undergraduates were asked to give answers to 24 MRT items,and wrong responses were coded and analyzed.The results indicated that all of their errors could be classified into four categories,among which the most frequent was the incomplete solution error(i.e.,omitting some rules).Errors made by participants with high or medium ability were mainly IC while errors of low-ability participants were nearly averagely distributed in four types.The results not only partly supported the cognitive model of MRT,but also helped design distracters in computerized AIG.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?