Components and metamorphism of the basements of the Qaidam and Oulongbuluke micro-continental blocks, and a tentative interpretation of paleocontinental evolution in NW-Central China
Chen Nengsong,Wang Qinyan,Chen Qiang,Li Xiaoyan
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3321/j.issn:1005-2321.2007.01.004
2007-01-01
Earth Science Frontiers
Abstract:The Qaidam and Oulongbuluke micro-continental blocks are geochemically similar to the Yangtze Block, but their metamorphic history are strikingly different from each other. The Delingha Complex and Dakendaban Group in the lower basement of the Oulongbuluke Block underwent upper amphibolite-facies to granulite-facies regional metamorphism and cratonization at ~1.95 Ga and were part of the assembly Columbia supercontinent. The greenschist-facies metamorphism along with the Mesoproterozoic Wandongguo Group at ~1.0 Ga corresponds to the assembly event of the Rodinia supercontinent. This was followed by continental breakup in the late Neoproterozoic and uplift in the Ordovician during the opening and closing of the Proto-Tethys Ocean. The basement of the Qaidam Block is mainly composed of the Mesoproterozoic Baishahe Formation of the Jinshuikou Group in the southern margin, and the Wulongtan Formation of the Shaliuhe Group on the northern margin. These formations were part of the assembly event of the Rodinia supercontinent, and were associated with intrusion of S-type granitoids. During the late Pan-African tectonothemal event (520-480 Ma), the Qaidam Block was subducted and collided with Gondwanaland terranes and was subjected to medium-pressure amphibolite-to granulite-facies metamorphism and HP-UHP metamorphism. Following these metamorphic events, the Block broke up and moved into the Proto-Tethys Ocean, and was subjected to metamorphism during 460-420 Ma due to closing of the Proto-Tethys Ocean. Regional comparisons show that the Oulongbuluke Block has similarities with the Arlashan Block and the Tarim Block as well as Yangtze Block in the Paleoproterozoic basements in principal part, the late Paleoproterozoic cratonization, the assembly of parts of the Rodinia supercontinent and the ~450 Ma tectonothermal event. However, the Qaidam Block has similarity with the North Qinling Block as well as the Qilian Block in the ~500 Ma tectonothemal event in addition to the Mesoproterozoic basement components, responding to assembly event of Rodinia supercontinent and the ~450 Ma tectonothermal event. Accordingly, these blocks can be separately grouped into Tarim-Ouloungbuluke blocks and Qaidam-Qinling blocks. The ~500 Ma and ~450 Ma tectonothermal events that recorded in the Qaidam-Qinling blocks are of different origins.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?