Abstract:The proliferation of technology has facilitated data accessibility, leading to an expansion in the range of criteria employed in decision problem design. This situation offers an advantage for making precise and rational decisions, but when it comes to managing spending, it becomes a disadvantage. Specifically, the expense of acquiring expert views utilized in the computation of criteria weights by subjective approaches experiences a substantial rise. Hence, decision-makers may employ objective methodologies to determine criterion weights. Nevertheless, objective methods provide a more limited range of choices compared to subjective methods. The study aims to utilize two widely recognized fundamental statistical approaches in order to enhance the capabilities of objective methods. One of the suggested approaches is the dissimilarity-based weighting method, which calculates the differentiation of values within the criteria. Another approach is the weighting method, which relies on the interquartile range. The methods were adapted as means of weighting criteria. Explanatory examples were provided, simulation-based comparisons were conducted, and ultimately applied to an actual data set. The data from each scenario were compared using the factorial analysis of variance method. The findings produced demonstrate that the proposed methods align with other objective methodologies. Furthermore, the proposed approaches were observed to take more time to finish the procedure compared to the Entropy and Standard Deviation methods, but less time compared to the Critic and Merec methods. Consequently, the suggested techniques are introduced as alternative approaches derived from established fundamental statistical procedures, which are straightforward to comprehend and valuable for professionals.

A Method of Weight Computing in the Comprehensive Estimation

Application of Euclidean Distance Model with Varying Weights in Comprehensive Assessment of Surface Water Quality

Threat Assess Ment Method with Uncertain Attribute Weight Based on Intuitionistic Fuzzy Multi-Attribute Decision

A Surface Water Quality Assessment Method Based on Combination Weight

Novel algorithm for attribute reduction based on mutual-information gain ratio

Study of the Method for Determining Weighting Coefficient of Coal Ash Slagging Fuzzy Combination Forecast Based on Rough Set Theory

Combination Weighting Approach Based on Deviation Function and Joint-Entropy

Estimating the Attribute Weights Through Evidential Reasoning and Mathematical Programming.

A NEW CRITERION OF DETERMINING MEASUREMENT WEIGHTS IN POWER SYSTEM STATE ESTIMATION

Discovering Weight Knowledge Based on Linguistic Information Aggregation

Portfolio Weighting Approach of Intensive Land Use Evaluation Based on Entropy and Deviation Function: A Case Study of YuHuan Economic Development Zones

A Generalized Attributes Significance Measure Method

Approximate Accuracy Approaches to Attribute Reduction for Information Systems

Method for determining comprehensive weight vector based on multiple linear fitting

Attribute Importance Measurement Based on the Data Effect and Its Performance Analysis in Computation Practice

A linguistic entropy weight method and its application in linguistic multi-attribute group decision making

Research on Multiple-Attribute Decision Making Problems Based on Similarity Relationship

Comparison of Objective Weight Determination Methods in Network Performance Evaluation

Assessment Attribute Reduction for Aquatic Products Quality Safety System

Constructing importance measure of attributes in covering decision table.

Basic statistical methods in determining criteria weights