Research on Motivation of China M & A Tide :Based on the Comparison of the Western Theories with Chinese Enterprises

Su Jingqin,Liu Jing
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1008-3448.2013.02.007
2013-01-01
Abstract:The number of transactions and amount of the transactions of cross-border mergers and acquisitions of Chinese enterprises in 2011 were 207 and $ 42.9 billion which broke the previous record.Furthermore,Chinese enterprises continued to maintain M & A momentum in terms of "Snake Swallows Elephant".What are the motivations of cross-border mergers and acquisitions of Chinese enterprises? And what are the difference characteristics between Chinese enterprises and Western theories in this area? This article aims to uncover characteristics of the motivations of cross-border mergers and acquisitions of Chinese enterprises.Views of western theories and cases of cross-border mergers and acquisitions of Chinese enterprises were compared in order to explore the answer(s) for above questions.Two samples were selected,firstly,78 papers published on top foreign journals from 2006 to 2011 about management were chosen as our one sample.Each paper was read carefully and discourses about motivation of cross-border mergers and acquisitions were extracted and coded as 196 clauses.Then these clauses were classed according to five kinds of theories introduced in literature review section.Secondly,different data about M & A of 10 typical Chinese enterprises were collected and also coded as 293 clauses.It shows that,both views focused on the theory in sight of resource-based theory,western theory emphasized the effective use of the intangible resources of the enterprise management capabilities,experience and brand equity,while Chinese companies focused on property rights,management experience,technology,brand and sales channels.The motivations of Chinese M & A companies were explained in industry shock theory better than for western theory,while market power theory and transaction cost theory are on contrast.We discuss the differences between views of western theories and cases of cross-border mergers and acquisitions of Chinese enterprises and provide Chinese enterprises for more explicit guidance on their cross-border mergers and acquisitions.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?