New Doctrine of Legal Evidence
Chen Ruihua
2012-01-01
Abstract:The doctrine of regulating the weight of evidence prevails in Chinese evidence legislation,namely the new doctrine of legal evidence.Accordingly,Chinese evidence law establishes many regulatory rules based upon the different weight of evidence.In particular,the different weight of evidence,including direct evidence and indirect evidence,original evidence and unoriginal evidence,testimony and written testimony,are prescribed in evidence law.Besides,the relationship between witness and case is also a necessary consideration when determining the weight of relevant evidence.Meanwhile,evidence law emphasizes that evidence should be verified mutually,otherwise they might be excluded.As for the standard of fact-finding,many objective standards,such as verifying mutually,corroboration of confession,system of proof and exclusiveness of any other possibility,are established for judges' discretion.The priority for genuine evidence,limitation of discretionary power and the tendency of inquisition and administration in criminal procedure are the three main reasons for the new doctrine of legal evidence.Although it seems practicable and reasonable in current situation,this new doctrine has brought about many adverse impacts as well.For example,this doctrine confuses the weight of evidence and its competence,makes some individual thumb rules and logic rules become the universal rules inappropriately,formalizes the process of admitting evidence and fact-finding if some rules were obeyed strictly,and leads to the abuse of discretionary power in order to meet the required standards of proof.In order to improve Chinese evidence legislation in the future,we have to rethink about the new doctrine of legal evidence and its related statute laws,and try to eliminate the systematic and cultural factors causing this doctrine.