How much natural ventilation rate can suppress COVID-19 transmission in occupancy zones?
Amir Nejatian,Faranak Ebrahimian Sadabad,Farshad M. Shirazi,Seyed Faraz Nejati,Samaneh Nakhaee,Omid Mehrpour
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/jrms.jrms_796_22
2024-02-23
Journal of Research in Medical Sciences
Abstract:The World Health Organization declared COVID-19 a global epidemic on March 12, 2020, due to its widespread prevalence. [ 1 ] As of February 2021, approximately 94 million people have been infected, and 2 million have lost their lives, with nearly a quarter of the cases and deaths occurring in the United States. [ 2 ] The disease can spread through respiratory droplets and airborne particulates, which can come in contact with the mucosal membrane of the eyes, nasal passages, and oral cavities, leading to infection. [ 3-5 ] The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recommended screening employees for symptoms such as cough and fever. However, a significant portion of the workforce may have asymptomatic infection. It is estimated that 20% of SARS-COV-2 infections were asymptomatic, with an average incubation period of 2–5 days. [ 6-9 ] The main transmission route indoors is respiratory droplets due to sneezing and coughing. [ 10 , 11 ] CDC recommends a distance of 6 feet or 2 m to mitigate potential exposure, [ 12 ] although these distances may not be sufficient since respiratory droplets can travel about 4–8 m. [ 13-15 ] Some respiratory droplets expelled from sneezing, speaking, or coughing are deposited on surfaces; the rest remain airborne. [ 16 , 17 ] Therefore, sufficient ventilation can control infection by introducing fresh, virus-free air and removing particulate matter from the environment. [ 18 ] Infection risk decreases through dilution and removal of airborne particles. [ 18 , 19 ] Many regulatory organizations, including the American Society of Heating, Refrigerating, and Air-Conditioning Engineers (ASHRAE) and CDC, [ 20 ] have emphasized that "proper ventilation" can help mitigate the spread of disease. However, no specific ventilation rates have been suggested so far. Recommendations generally require increased ventilation, outdoor air introduction, and decreased occupancy. [ 21-25 ] This study aimed to evaluate the impact of single or double openings on increasing ventilation and decreasing virus load in standard indoor spaces. In this study, the prevalence of the disease in occupancy zones, the effect of natural and mechanical ventilation, and the use of masks were evaluated using a mass balance equation and recommends an appropriate ventilation rate to reduce the risk of infection. Such studies will be crucial in reducing the risk of infection and expediting the revival of the economy.
medicine, general & internal